Base on what seems to bothers me alot,  Since co habitation is that really bad,  would u prefer sleeping with married men/married women or would u co habited,
Plase which would u guys prefer,
am yet to make  a decision plase we all know both is bad but if worst come to worst which would u rather prefer.

Please no Joke.

Co habit when he has not asked you to marry him?

Both of them are bad,shikena. But if push comes to shove,i'd rather have a live-in lover tham commit adultery.

poster is prrobably Moslem'

Atreus are u saying u wont sleep with ur live-in lover?

Read this carefully, though is long but if u can be patince to read it's will help


     
Myths About Cohabitation
from All About Cohabiting Before Marriage

"The truth is that wherever a man lies with a woman,
there, whether they like it or not, a transcendental relation is set
up between them which must be eternally enjoyed or eternally endured."



There are a number of reasons given today for living together, most of which are based on current popular myths. Several of the most common myths of the day are:

Myth #One:
"Everybody's Doing It!"
Everybody is not "doing it." Statistics show that of the college-age people, 65 to 80 percent are sexually active and some of those are living together (Marco 1997). Johnson (1996) estimates 30 to 40 percent of college students cohabit during their time at college. Although this is a large number, this also indicates that somewhere between 20 and 35 percent are not sexually active and somewhere around 60 to 70 percent of students do not cohabit. Therefore, to say "everybody's doing it," is a myth and does not hold up as a valid justification for cohabiting.


Myth #Two:
"Economically It's Worth It To Live Together."
First, it is cheaper for two to live together. However, whatever monetary or other savings are realized from making the choice to living together is also the price at which one will compromise, lose or sell out one's moral standards, virginity, and purity. Second, economical advantages don't in themselves determine whether something is morally right or wrong. Third, the majority of cohabitants do eventually break up and economics are obviously not an overwhelming impediment then, so why allow it to become a controlling factor from the start. The moral questions ought to be, "What is my virginity worth" and "Will I save myself for my lifelong spouse?" Kevin Leman in Smart Kids, Stupid Choices says, "it's kind of like giving someone a million dollars and later finding out you gave it to the wrong person, but now he's gone and so is your money. Gone for good. You don't have it anymore. And the person who should have had it will now never get it."

Myth #Three:
"Living Together Before Marriage Increases Your Chances of Having a Happy Marriage Later."
You "test drive a car" before you buy it, so why not do the same with your lifelong relationships. Another one that is heard often is "you try on a pair of shoes to see if they fit before you buy them, why not your spouse." Someone has said, when you test drive a car you don't pack your personal luggage in the trunk or when you try on a pair of new shoes you don't want everyone else's foot odor and fungus already in them. You can throw away shoes without hurting anyone, but you can't throw away a person without hurting them and possibly others. The great paradox is that research indicates just the opposite of this conventional 'wisdom'. Numerous studies (see "Reasons" below) have shown that couples who have lived together before marriage are more likely to disagree on things like recreation, household chores and finances and are more likely to seek counseling than couples who do not cohabit. The scriptures tell us to "flee fornication" (1 Cor. 6:18), and to "flee the evil desires of youth, and pursue righteousness" (2 Tim. 2:22). In other words, avoid all sexual looseness like the plague. The rate of divorce skyrocketing in the last three decades during the same period as the rise of "living together" is proof enough that "trial marriages" are a failure.

Myth #Four:
"Doing It Won't Hurt Anyone."
Many people are permanently hurt, either emotionally or physically, or both. Even those not directly involved such as your friends and parents may get hurt. Marco (1997) lists several statistics for college age people, including the facts that 63% of all STDs happen to people less than 25 and more than 20% of all persons with AIDS are college age. Sin is like throwing a pebble in a pond, it involves only the pebble and the water, but it sends ripples across the entire pond. Sin is never solitary. It always has rippling effects. Sin can also be compared to a spreadsheet where a change of one cell affects the entire outcome at the end. Man sometimes lives as though one single behavior or event is an isolated cell that doesn't affect another; but it does. One's philosophy of life is like the controlling formula of a spreadsheet. When one part is changed, it changes the whole of it.

Myth #Five:
"It's Nobody's Business."
It is said that "living together has much in common with marriage except for the legal imposition of the church and state" However, there are birth, health and disease issues that arise as a consequence of cohabiting which do very much become the responsibility and expense of society. The church is a vital part of society and as such, has the responsibility to uphold that which is the best for society. If the couple wants to be married in the church, then it does become church business. The church itself also has the responsibility to uphold scriptural standards of purity, which is its business. We are admonished in scripture and have the responsibility to speak the truth in love (Eph. 4:15). Also, churches help launch and keep lasting marriages. Frequent church attenders have lower divorce rates because they are exposed to teaching and instruction on marital success and because the church body lends support and accountability to couples (Mattox 1997).

Myth #Six:
"It's All-Right Because We're Really In Love!"
First, love can never be a reason for premarital sex; rather, it is one of the greatest reasons to avoid premarital sex (Martin & Myers 1996). True love would never seek the spiritual downfall of another (Rom. 13:10). The scripture says that love is patient and kind; it does not seek to please itself, nor does it delight in evil, but is always hopeful (1Cor. 13). Therefore, true love is patient in waiting for the proper time for sex. It is kind to future spouses by not pre-harming marital intimacy. True love would be unselfish in placing God's will and the needs of others above self. It would not delight in the evil of disobedience, nor would it force another to disobey God (Martin & Myers 1996). Second, the 'feelings of love' are tricky. Jim Long in Campus Life (February 1986) states, "Love can fool you. Your feelings can trick you. The line between love and infatuation is thin. And frankly, sex confuses everything. To be physically involved clouds the issue. It makes you feel closer than you really are. It makes you feel as if you are actually in love. Maybe so. Maybe not." Third, living together is a form of prostitution and love. Dunagan (1993), for example, explains the Greek word rendered 'fornication' is 'porneia', which also means prostitution, and 'porne' was the word for prostitute. God choose these words to describe and label any sexual activity outside of marriage. (1 Cor. 7:9; Matt. 19:9). Fornication is essentially the love that is bought or sold, which is not love at all. The person with whom such 'love' (lust) is gratified is not really considered a person at all, but as a thing. He or she is a mere instrument through which the demands of lust and passion are satisfied. God is letting us know, to call such 'love' is false.

Myth #Seven:
"But We're Going To Be Married Anyway."
This is presumptuous, naive, and wishful thinking. There is often one person in the relationship who doesn't think in terms of a permanent, lifelong relationship. The lingering question is: "If one gives in to moral temptation before marriage, what's going to be different and prevent them from repeating the behavior once the honeymoon is over?"

Myth #Eight:
"The Bible Doesn't Teach That a Civil or Religious Ceremony Must Be Performed For Marriage to Be Valid In God's Eye, So Why Have One?"
The institution of marriage was first created and ordained of God (Gen. 2) and all marriages are still blessings ordained by Him in order that two may become one. It is evident that in biblical times there was a contractual agreement, perhaps verbal, signifying marriage. The parables of "The Wedding Garment" (Matt. 22:11-14) and The Ten Virgins" (Mt. 25:1-13) indicate that marriage took place at a given time and place. The scripture says "Give to Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God what is God's" (Mt. 22:21; Mk. 12:17 & Lk. 20:25). The government (the 'Caesar' of our day) requires that we must have a marriage license in order to be legally recognized. Since a marriage ceremony is a civil requirement, we are obligated as law abiding citizens and Christians to observe it.

Myth #Nine:
"It'll Enhance My Self-Esteem and Inner Security."
Marco (1997) provides a quote which he believes best sums up what the studies show: "I slept with many, many people trying to find love, to find self-worth. And the more people I slept with the less self-worth I had." It makes sense he says, when you give yourself as "pieces" to a lot of people, you are no longer whole, and as a consequence, may actually feel less self-worth and inner security -- because part(s) of you is (are) missing.

Myth #Ten:"The Bible is Silent on the Subject."
A common myth heard often is that there is nothing in the Bible condemning a couple for having physical relations prior to marriage.1 Corinthians 7:2 says, "but, because of fornications, let each man have his own wife, and let each woman have her own husband." Dunagan (1993) explains, 'Fornication' is unlawful sexual activity of any kind. In this verse Paul places the marriage relationship in contrast to fornication. Fornication can be avoided when you have your own spouse. Therefore, 'fornication-unlawful sexual activity' exists in a relationship in which a man and woman are physically intimate, and yet not married. And the Bible is very clear regarding the consequences of fornication (1 Cor. 6:9; Gal. 5:19-21; Rev. 21:8; Heb.13:4). In addition, Paul informs those that don't have the self-control to live the single life, to marry. (1 Cor. 7:9).

Myth #Eleven:
"The Marriage License Is Only a Piece of Paper, and it Doesn't Automatically Make Two People Committed to Each Other."
"It won't make me love you more." "We are already committed to each other, we don't need a piece of paper to prove it." Dunagan (1993) presents the other side of the argument: "If there's no difference in your relationship, what's wrong with adding one more symbol to your total commitment?" Evidently, marriage consists of more than just a piece of paper. After all, Dunagan says, who raises strong objections over 'just a piece of paper'? Who has ever objected to buying a ring (or anything nice) just to prove their love? OR, 'We're committed to each other, we love each other, we don't need to sleep together to prove that we love each other'; OR, 'I love you . . . really committed to you, but not for a lifetime'; OR, 'I love you, but not enough to want you to be my wife'; OR, ' I love you, but not enough to want to wear your last name"; I love you, but not enough to vow such love before God, family and friends'; OR, 'I love you, but not enough to enter into a relationship that brings you honor, respect and preserves your dignity."

Myth # 12:
Cohabitation, marriage, and divorce is, can be, or should be, just another lifestyle choice, a purely personal relationship created by and for the couple.
This is the "most powerful and dangerous myth," according to Waite and Gallagher (2000:6) because it goes to the heart of the issue. There is an increasing tendency today to view marriage not as objective fact, but a subjective emotion––an inner feeling rather than an outer relationship. We have been duped into thinking that cohabitation, marriage and divorce is primarily for and about adult happiness. We evaluate our relationship primarily according to how well it satisfies my own personal need (Cherlin 1992:71).
In a recent statement by the Catholic Bishops of Pennsylvania, they said sex is intensely private and personal, but it also has deep moral and social dimensions. Sex works as a primary bonding agent in families and the family is the building block of society. Sexual rights and wrongs influence the health and happiness of individuals, families, and neighborhoods. That's why sexual behavior has always been the subject of much civil law. The Church, of course, wishes to safeguard the family and society. But, more than that, the Church wishes to safeguard your relationship with your future spouse and with God. Sex is the act that seals and renews the couple's marriage covenant before God. Sexual sins, then, are not just between a man and a woman, but between the couple and God. And that's the Church's responsibility. Sex is not simply a private matter. If it's between you and God, it's between you and the Church. You need to ask yourself: "When do I stop being a Christian? When I close the bedroom door? When does my relationship with God cease to matter?"

Myth # 13:
What we do with our own bodies does not affect our relationship with each other or our spiritual relationship with God.
Again, the Catholic Bishops of Pennsylvania offer good advice: the gift of your body in sexual intercourse is a profound symbol of the giving of your whole self. In making love, the husband and wife are saying to one another in "body language" what they said to each other at the altar on their wedding day: "I am yours, for life!" God created sex to be physically pleasurable and emotionally fulfilling. But it is even greater than all that. It is, above all, the deepest sign of the complete gift of self that a husband and wife pledge to each other. This mutual gift empowers the couple to become co-creators with God in giving life to a new person, a baby. According to God's design, the gift of sexual union has two primary purposes: strengthening married love and sharing that love with children.
The only place where this total self-giving between a man and a woman is to take place is in marriage. It is the only place where children can be raised with the secure, committed love of a mother and a father. So sexual intimacy belongs only in marriage. Outside of marriage, sex is a lie. The action says, "I give you my whole self." But the man and woman are really holding back their commitment, their fertility, and their relationship with God. Before giving your body to another person, you need to give your whole life, and you need to receive your spouse's whole life in return––and that can only happen in marriage.

Myth # 14:
We can have sex together and not become involved, even on an emotional level.
Dr. Neil Clark Warren of eHarmony, who has heard this numerous times says, "we know from our own studies that sexual involvement prior to a committed relationship of two persons who have vowed to remain faithful to each other for a lifetime always turns out to be problematical. When you get sexually involved with another person, you become highly dependent on them. You become deeply involved at the most profound levels of your being. It is as though your psyche, your soul, your body, becomes totally interrelated with the other person's psyche, soul, and body, such that the two of you really are bonded on the most fundamental level possible." As soon as there is sexual involvement before marriage, the decision to get married becomes a foregone conclusion. "In other words, the sexual bonding caused them to assume that the decision about getting married had already been made. I believe that sexual bonding often takes place far before intercourse," says Dr. Warren.

"The monstrosity of sexual intercourse outside marriage is that those who indulge in it are trying to isolate one kind of union (the sexual) from all the other kinds of union which were intended to go along with it and make up the total union. The Christian attitude does not mean that there is anything wrong about sexual pleasure, any more than the pleasure of eating. It means that you must not isolate that pleasure and try to get it by itself, any more than you ought to try to get the pleasures of taste without swallowing and digesting, by chewing things and spitting them out again."
C. S. Lewis, Mere Christianity

Yes i would. She'd be my live-in LOVER,remember?

Then you are still commiting adultery? OR what is adultery? Sleeping with someone when u guys are not married?

Adultery-sexual relations outside the marriage. I'm not married,but if i slept with a married woman it'd be adultery. If i were married and i slept with another married woman,it would still be adultery.

Who said co habiting was bad? Must we all get married?

None does it for me!

none of the above.

Might consider co-habitation if i can have a separate room

ammamat:

Base on what seems to bothers me alot, Since co habitation is that really bad, would u prefer sleeping with married men/married women or would u co habited,
Plase which would u guys prefer,
am yet to make a decision plase we all know both is bad but if worst come to worst which would u rather prefer.

Please no Joke.

so basically ur question is, between hell fire and the lake of fire, which one should i choose? hmmmm, this is a tough one, give me a minute let me go ask the devil which one is hotter

I guess the single males are all dating and marrying whites, AAs and other non-naijas.

what a mentality the OP has.

Then when you clock 45 with no viable male or female in sight you start disturbing others with long story.

Even if you're Muslim, is it every muslim that acts like this?

ammamat:

Base on what seems to bothers me alot, Since co habitation is that really bad, would u prefer sleeping with married men/married women or would u co habited,
Plase which would u guys prefer,
am yet to make a decision plase we all know both is bad but if worst come to worst which would u rather prefer.

Please no Joke.

Why is everybody saying cohabitation is bad? Granted,i might not agree with it,but it's a personal choice,so i dont really get why posters are making it seem like some terrible sin.

Co-habitation is the lesser of the two evils!

At least you are not breaking a home or hurting another woman, by sleeping with her husband.

Personally, I dont see anything wrong in living with your Fiancee. If marriage is already in the picture, living with him is not a crime!!

Atreus:

Why is everybody saying cohabitation is bad? Granted,i might not agree with it,but it's a personal choice,so i dont really get why posters are making it seem like some terrible sin.

reread her post

ammamat:

Base on what seems to bothers me alot, Since co habitation is that really bad, would u prefer sleeping with married men/married women or would u co habited, Plase which would u guys prefer,
am yet to make a decision plase we all know both is bad but if worst come to worst which would u rather prefer.

Please no Joke.

she's talking of cohabitation with a married man or woman. As opposed to just sleeping with them on the sly.

Maybe its just me, but I dont understand why someone would consider a married man or woman as their only dating options?

then these women complain when the available single men get snatched up by non-Nigerians. Very low self esteem, which is a pity.

Sorry oh,i thought she was talking about cohabitation and adultery as two seperate activities. If she's talking about being a married man's spare tyre and living with him or just sleeping with him,then both of them are very very wrong. There are some things you just dont mess with,and marriage is one of them.

Basically both options are bad. Talking about cohabitation, the woman is primarily short-changing herself.

Hmmm, so would the man leave his entire family, so that both of you can cohabit??  

una just dey talk talk, cohabitation oooo, dating married manoooo, al na adultery/fornication, al are bad but it depends on individual choice to chose either,

Whether you co-habit or not, once you are involved with a married man, sex is going to be on the menu. If he wanted a platonic relationship, he would not touch you let alone speak with you.

Please don't even contemplate it. Those women are home-wreckers and we all know how the world frowns on such people. Besides, affairs are mostly short-lived and if you're a christian, its not accepted in the bible.

Why play second fiddle, when you can be the main one?

Don't accept his lies of having problems with his wife. Its just a lame excuse to get you emotionally juiced up for him. Those are the same guys that make marriage meaningless to many people.

I have realised that us Nigerian are very fond of playing Holy Holy, in my view there's nothing absolutely wrong with Co-habitaion! And may i ask if all couples cohabitating are necessarily Having sex (Fornication as you call it)? Most of the people in the UK are just patners as they call it and aint married. This also applies to other advanced/developed countries and no one is shouting about it. We forget the fact that we have more churches in Nigeria, pray harder than other nations do, and yet we are very very poor in Nigeria. Nigeria is not making any economic progress, Businesses are a "Charade" and all we do is fool ourselves about our preachings; Fornication, adultery, etc. You people should talk about the most important things abeg! Bill Clinton commited Adultery and he and his entire generation can never be poor, infact he is almsot always in Nigeria making more money from 'wanna-be' Nigerian businesses.

You guys pls pls pls,

All these things are long thing. Why wont my girl friend stay with me.

If any girl is stupid to date me as a married man, why should I complain again?

You can live with anybody but you can't sleep with everybody you can live with.

I hope that i wont ever have to choose either of them but without my xtian mind,i'd prefer a live in lover.

@Dasarge, globally it is morally and unethical to engage in extra-marital affairs and if you go a step futher to marry, it becomes bigamy. Bill clinton was tried by the US Senate on charges of perjury (denying on oath about the adultery charges) and even John Prescott's, the deputy Prime Minister (under Blair) career was destroyed as result of his affair with his secretary Tracey Temple. There are also quite a huge number of politicians like that including Spitzer (NY ex-gov) who had to resign from office cuz of a prostitute.

My point is, if you want to date married men, then by all means go ahead but don't critcize people who thinks it's wrong cuz it's wrong worldwide and not just in Nigeria. Infact I do think it's more accepted in Nigeria than in the western world.

OpeLovely above got it quite right.

Non of them is ideal, but if you are already sleeping with an equally single partner, it is pardonable to cohabit than to go and commit adultery.