MuttleyLaff:
I dont think you at all yourself see the clear distinction between them "the sons of God" and the daughters of men.

I dont think you've ever given it considerable deep and careful thought that if there were "the sons of God" and the daughters of men, there equally would exist too "the sons of men" and the daughters of God. Maybe if you had, it would have made it easier to make the clear distinction.

Since we are on the subject of "the sons of God" and the daughters of men, here's another very good question, which I hope you wont side step or shy from answering. Why was Noah considered to be the only righteous person in his generation? What did he do?

Of course not, two normal human offspring can never result in any race of wicked giants that will lead to theirs and everyone's destruction by a world wide flood however what it will take to result in a race of wicked giants, that will lead to their and everyones destruction by a world wide flood, is only if, one half of the two humans meeting sexually is to be somehow before then already wicked or somewhere already twisted.

2 Peter 2:4 does nothing of the sort, you alleging confirming Genesis 6:2

Re-read 2 Peter 2:4 and similar verse in Jude, to find out it actually is nipping slanders, fables, myths etcetera in the bud, quashing the same thing you're warming up to introduce and trying very hard to advance on this thread

I bet you're uneasily sweating right now and almost on the verge of crapping your pant. I did give you a brotherly and friendly warning to change your pants

So was I right in saying you will fail and be unable to prove beyond a reasonable doubt to establish that the sons of God mentioned in Job 1:6, Job 2:1 and Job 38:7 are angels, especially when I say, they are human beings, just same way there are human beings in Genesis 6:2 and Genesis 6:4 and like we as human being are also sons/daughters of God by virtue of our belief and the testament of John 1:12

Do you want to man up and admit you have no proof of any chapter(s) or verse(s) that confirms the Genesis 6:2 and Genesis 6:4 "sons of God" mentioning, to be human beings other than the average sons of men or you're scared to own up to your shortcoming, hmm? I hope you are aware that pride is a terrible failing

Please dont be making it a habit of skipping answering questions put to you and ignoring them. Thought you said you arent scared.

Please refrain from not attending to answering any outstanding unanswered question, including the bonus question too. If its just "I dont know the answer," reply you give, that suits me fine and I wouldnt hold it against you, because nobody is an island of information and knowledge. Nobody except God, is All knowing. Thank you.

oga you are blabbing too much I have given you scriptures proving the sons of God in genesis are angels. I also gave a translation from niv and kjv.
The bible cannot be clearer than that. You are the person who is yet to prove anything to me,.. Prove it show me scriptures were the sons of God in genesis is said to be the human men. Go straight to the point don't type too much words.

EMILO2STAY:
oga you are blabbing too much I have given you scriptures proving the sons of God in genesis are angels. I also gave a translation from niv and kjv.

The bible cannot be clearer than that. You are the person who is yet to prove anything to me,.. Prove it show me scriptures were the sons of God in genesis is said to be the human men. Go straight to the point don't type too much words.

I can see you are one of those guys that have a complex about content, about being grilled and are all talk and mouth but no trousers.

I have given you ample and more than enough chance to shine, to be a star by proving beyond reasonable doubt all your assertions. I have shown you my cards, faced up open. You know where I am coming and can make out my direction, where I am heading, but here you are fidgeting and behaving indifferently to my questions and probing of you.

You know your assertions aren't standing up, especially as I am putting them under scrutiny, so why you are resorting to say I am blabbing, smh. Please what is stopping you just simply answer each and every one of my asked questions, erhn? You can't say I didn't pre-warn you that you're about biting more than you can chew and swallow. If you're are unable or refuse to answer all questions, or just admit you don't know, then I suggest you throw in the towel and admit you aren't up to task to further have this discussion. I am waiting nwanne for your answers. Thank you.

When you attend to the outstanding questions, I will give you the proof the sons of God are human beings both in Genesis and Job OK? Not and never before then. Have I made myself clear on the matter hmm? You now know where I stand about proving anything to you, yeah?

MuttleyLaff:
I can see you are one of those guys that have a complex about content, about being grilled and are all talk and mouth but no trousers.

I have given you ample and more than enough chance to shine, to be a star by proving beyond reasonable doubt all your assertions. I have shown you my cards, faced up open. You know where I am coming and can make out my direction, where I am heading, but here you are fidgeting and behaving indifferently to my questions and probing of you.

You know your assertions aren't standing up, especially as I am putting them under scrutiny, so why you are resorting to say I am blabbing, smh. Please what is stopping you just simply answer each and every one of my asked questions, erhn? You can't say I didn't pre-warn you that you're about biting more than you can chew and swallow. If you're are unable or refuse to answer all questions, or just admit you don't know, then I suggest you throw in the towel and admit you aren't up to task to further have this discussion. I am waiting nwanne for your answers. Thank you.

When you attend to the outstanding questions, I will give you the proof the sons of God are human beings both in Genesis and Job OK? Not and never before then. Have I made myself clear on the matter hmm? You now know where I stand about proving anything to you, yeah?

I think your a waste of my time. You want want me to to add to the bible what is not in the bible.
At first you said there was no nephilim, later you changed ground. Now it is sons of God. I have given answers to your so called question but you haven't given me one of your so called proof instead you type many words that prove nothing. Oga give me the proof from the scriptures the son God mentioned in genesis and job are humans and stop typing many words.

EMILO2STAY:
I think your a waste of my time. You want want me to to add to the bible what is not in the bible.

Why would I want you to add to the Bible? Have I asked to you to add to the bible or actually asked you to back up your answers with Bible and prove beyond reasonable doubt, hmm? I have been fair and generous from the onset with you. I even gave you the option to say "I don't know" that's if you are finding it answering any of the questions. What more do you expect from me

EMILO2STAY:
At first you said there was no nephilim, later you changed ground. Now it is sons of God.

Hmm, Chief please don't start with porkies. I won't lie to you, so please don't lie to me too. I never anywhere, said there were no Nephilim. I never attributed the Nephilim any time to be sons of God. Please go over again all what I typed and asked you concerning the Nephilim and sons of God

EMILO2STAY:
I have given answers to your so called question but you haven't given me one of your so called proof instead you type many words that prove nothing

Smh, if you had answered all my questions, all this won't happen and you trying to make excuses that I am typing too many words. Do you find my "too many words" intimidating or threatening ni?

EMILO2STAY:
Oga give me the proof from the scriptures the son God mentioned in genesis and job are humans and stop typing many words.

I already made myself clear how and when that will happen. Do the right thing and in order, instead of trying to pull a fast one and jumping the gun

To be honest, I am increasingly beginning to think you're out of your depth here with this subject, but you don't want to admit or resign to this fact

MuttleyLaff:
Why would I want you to add to the Bible? Have I asked to you to add to the bible or actually asked you to back up your answers with Bible and prove beyond reasonable doubt, hmm? I have been fair and generous from the onset with you. I even gave you the option to say "I don't know" that's if you are finding it answering any of the questions. What more do you expect from me

Hmm, Chief please don't start with porkies. I won't lie to you, so please don't lie to me too. I never anywhere, said there were no Nephilim. I never attributed the Nephilim any time to be sons of God. Please go over again all what I typed and asked you concerning the Nephilim and sons of God

Smh, if you had answered all my questions, all this won't happen and you trying to make excuses that I am typing too many words. Do you find my "too many words" intimidating or threatening ni?

I already made myself clear how and when that will happen. Do the right thing and in order, instead of trying to pull a fast one and jumping the gun

To be honest, I am increasingly beginning to think you're out of your depth here with this subject, but you don't want to admit or resign to this fact

bye,.. your a waste of time. If you can't prove zilch like I have done pls don't quote me again

EMILO2STAY:
bye,.. your a waste of time.

Please dont say I am a waste of time. Don't be like that, especially when you didnt answer my bonus question, the one I asked about "Why was Noah considered to be the only righteous person in his generation? What did he do?"

EMILO2STAY:
If you can't prove zilch like I have done ...

I can prove my confident and forceful statement of fact and truth that the sons of God are actually human beings, and are not angels as you believe.

I had to go over your past posts on this thread to see whether you had really proved anything, as you claim you have, but I couldnt find anything supporting you proved anything

EMILO2STAY:
... pls don't quote me again

It hasnt come to this now, this isnt a fight ke, why the sudden animosty hmm? There's no way you can say I've annoyed ...absolutely no way, actually I should have been annoyed at you for parrying and dodging my questions. You made me laugh when I read your "pls don't quote me again" comment. What you going to do now then that I've quoted you huh. You'll be coming to my house to come beat me up for quoting and mentioning EMILO2STAY, erhn?

Nwanne, we are here to build each other up, but if you dont want no build with us and especially me, then no problem, as I never liked your cement anyway, which was why I asked you to back up your answers for me, with Bible and prove beyond reasonable doubt establishing that the sons of God mentioned in Job 1:6, Job 2:1 and Job 38:7 are angels, especially when I say, they are human beings, just same way there are human beings in Genesis 6:2 and Genesis 6:4 and like we as human being are also sons/daughters of God by virtue of our belief and the testament of John 1:12

Do you want to man up and admit you have no proof of any chapter(s) or verse(s) that confirms the Genesis 6:2 and Genesis 6:4 "sons of God" mentioning, to be human beings other than the average sons of men or you're scared to own up to your shortcoming, hmm? I hope you are aware that pride is a terrible failing

You took what I said lightly, took it very lightly indeed, when I said, you've bitten more than you chew and that you will fail and be unable to prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

I hold the conquering truth, but as I've earlier said, pride is a terrible failing that's threatening and preventing we learn the truth.

Truths have thorns about them, and more the reason it needs holding delicately, if not held that way, frustration leads to wanting to give the custodian of truth, someone like me, for example, a bloody nose. Truth is bitter in the beginning, sweet in the end and lies are sweet in the beginning, bitter in the end, as in, when they are exposed. Then comes a tremendous bitterness, that you have been deceived by all, by your parents, by all your sunday school teachers, by your pastors, by brethren/sisters etcetera. You've been continuously deceived and misled to think that the sons of God are angels. What a complete and utter travesty of the truth. It is well nwanne.

EMILO2STAY:
bye,.. your a waste of time.

Please dont say I am a waste of time. Don't be like that, especially when you didnt answer my bonus question, the one I asked about "Why was Noah considered to be the only righteous person in his generation? What did he do?"

EMILO2STAY:
If you can't prove zilch like I have done ...

I can prove my confident and forceful statement of fact and truth that the sons of God are actually human beings, and are not angels as you believe.

I had to go over your past posts on this thread to see whether you had really proved anything, as you claim you have, but I couldnt find anything supporting you proved anything

EMILO2STAY:
... pls don't quote me again

It hasnt come to this now, this isnt a fight ke, why the sudden animosty hmm? There's no way you can say I've annoyed ...absolutely no way, actually I should have been annoyed at you for parrying and dodging my questions. You made me laugh when I read your "pls don't quote me again" comment. What you going to do now then that I've quoted you huh. You'll be coming to my house to come beat me up for quoting and mentioning EMILO2STAY, erhn?

Nwanne, we are here to build each other up, but if you dont want no build with us and especially me, then no problem, as I never liked your cement anyway, which was why I asked you to back up your answers for me, with Bible and prove beyond reasonable doubt establishing that the sons of God mentioned in Job 1:6, Job 2:1 and Job 38:7 are angels, especially when I say, they are human beings, just same way there are human beings in Genesis 6:2 and Genesis 6:4 and like we as human being are also sons/daughters of God by virtue of our belief and the testament of John 1:12

You took what I said lightly, took it very lightly indeed, when I said, you've bitten more than you chew and that you will fail and be unable to prove beyond a reasonable doubt who Genesis 6:2 and Genesis 6:4 "sons of God" are

I hold the conquering truth, but as I've earlier said, pride is a terrible failing that's threatening and preventing we learn the truth.

Truths have thorns about them, and more the reason it needs holding delicately, if not held that way, frustration leads to wanting to give the custodian of truth, someone like me, for example, a bloody nose. Truth is bitter in the beginning, sweet in the end and lies are sweet in the beginning, bitter in the end, as in, when they are exposed. Then comes a tremendous bitterness, that you have been deceived by all, by your parents, by all your sunday school teachers, by your pastors, by brethren/sisters etcetera. You've been continuously deceived and misled to think that the sons of God are angels. What a complete and utter travesty of the truth. It is well nwanne.

EMILO2STAY:
bye,.. your a waste of time.

Please dont say I am a waste of time. Don't be like that, especially when you didnt answer my bonus question, the one I asked about "Why was Noah considered to be the only righteous person in his generation? What did he do?" See nah, and to start with, you didnt answer that question. Are you now going to answer it?

EMILO2STAY:
If you can't prove zilch like I have done ...

I can prove my confident and forceful statement of fact and truth that the sons of God are actually human beings, and are not angels as you believe. I gave you the condition under and after which I happily will prove and divulge anything to you.

I had to go over your past posts on this thread to see whether you had really proved anything, as you claim you have, but I couldnt find anywhere supporting you proved anything

EMILO2STAY:
... pls don't quote me again

It hasnt come to this now, this isnt a fight ke, why the sudden animosty hmm? There's no way you can say I've annoyed ...absolutely no way, actually I should have been annoyed at you for parrying and dodging my questions. You made me laugh when I read your "pls don't quote me again" comment. What you going to do now then that I've quoted you huh. You'll be coming to my house to come beat me up for quoting and mentioning EMILO2STAY, erhn?

Nwanne, we are here to build each other up, but if you dont want no build with us and especially me, then no problem, as I never liked your cement anyway, which was why I asked you to back up your answers for me, with Bible and prove beyond reasonable doubt establishing that the sons of God mentioned in Job 1:6, Job 2:1 and Job 38:7 are angels, especially when I say, they are human beings, just same way there are human beings in Genesis 6:2 and Genesis 6:4 and like we as human being are also sons/daughters of God by virtue of our belief and the testament of John 1:12

You took what I said lightly, took it very lightly indeed, when I said, you've bitten more than you chew and that you will fail and be unable to prove beyond a reasonable doubt who Genesis 6:2 and Genesis 6:4 "sons of God" are

I hold a conquering truth, but as I've earlier said, pride is a terrible failing that's threatening and preventing we learn the truth.

Truths have thorns about them, and more the reason it needs holding delicately, if not held that way, frustration leads to wanting to give the custodian of truth, someone like me, for example, a bloody nose. Truth is bitter in the beginning, sweet in the end and lies are sweet in the beginning, bitter in the end, as in, when they are exposed. Then comes a tremendous bitterness, that you have been deceived by all, by your parents, by all your sunday school teachers, by your pastors, by brethren/sisters etcetera. You've been continuously deceived and misled, by them all, to think that the sons of God, in Genesis 6:2 and Genesis 6:4 plus in Job 1:6, Job 2:1 and Job 38:7 are angels. What a complete and utter travesty of the truth. It is well nwanne, I guess the truth, that you're unaware off, with proof and all, will reside within me still.

MuttleyLaff:
Please dont say I am a waste of time. Don't be like that, especially when you didnt answer my bonus question, the one I asked about "Why was Noah considered to be the only righteous person in his generation? What did he do?" See nah, and to start with, you didnt answer that question. Are you now going to answer it?

I can prove my confident and forceful statement of fact and truth that the sons of God are actually human beings, and are not angels as you believe. I gave you the condition under and after which I happily will prove and divulge anything to you.

I had to go over your past posts on this thread to see whether you had really proved anything, as you claim you have, but I couldnt find anywhere supporting you proved anything

It hasnt come to this now, this isnt a fight ke, why the sudden animosty hmm? There's no way you can say I've annoyed ...absolutely no way, actually I should have been annoyed at you for parrying and dodging my questions. You made me laugh when I read your "pls don't quote me again" comment. What you going to do now then that I've quoted you huh. You'll be coming to my house to come beat me up for quoting and mentioning EMILO2STAY, erhn?

Nwanne, we are here to build each other up, but if you dont want no build with us and especially me, then no problem, as I never liked your cement anyway, which was why I asked you to back up your answers for me, with Bible and prove beyond reasonable doubt establishing that the sons of God mentioned in Job 1:6, Job 2:1 and Job 38:7 are angels, especially when I say, they are human beings, just same way there are human beings in Genesis 6:2 and Genesis 6:4 and like we as human being are also sons/daughters of God by virtue of our belief and the testament of John 1:12

You took what I said lightly, took it very lightly indeed, when I said, you've bitten more than you chew and that you will fail and be unable to prove beyond a reasonable doubt who Genesis 6:2 and Genesis 6:4 "sons of God" are

I hold a conquering truth, but as I've earlier said, pride is a terrible failing that's threatening and preventing we learn the truth.

Truths have thorns about them, and more the reason it needs holding delicately, if not held that way, frustration leads to wanting to give the custodian of truth, someone like me, for example, a bloody nose. Truth is bitter in the beginning, sweet in the end and lies are sweet in the beginning, bitter in the end, as in, when they are exposed. Then comes a tremendous bitterness, that you have been deceived by all, by your parents, by all your sunday school teachers, by your pastors, by brethren/sisters etcetera. You've been continuously deceived and misled, by them all, to think that the sons of God, in Genesis 6:2 and Genesis 6:4 plus in Job 1:6, Job 2:1 and Job 38:7 are angels. What a complete and utter travesty of the truth. It is well nwanne, I guess the truth, that you're unaware off, with proof and all, will reside within me still.

total waste of time I should have known.

EMILO2STAY:
[s]total waste of time I should have known.[/s]

Why was Noah considered to be the only righteous person in his generation? What did he do that was credited him among his generation, to be righteous?

MuttleyLaff:
Why was Noah considered to be the only righteous person in his generation? What did he do that was credited him among his generation, to be righteous?

I can't believe what am what you just typed are you actually a grown man?. If I should go by what you mean, then we should still have the nephilims wrecking havoc today because according to you daughters of should mean the unrighteous people.

Noah was a just man before God because he and his family was the only people then who believed and served the true God.

EMILO2STAY:
[s]I can't believe what am what you just typed are you actually a grown man?[/s]

Who "grown man" epp? What has "grown man" got to do with anything that's being discussed here.

EMILO2STAY:
If I should go by what you mean, then we should still have the nephilims wrecking havoc today because according to you daughters of should mean the unrighteous people.

Please calm down and have it together to be correctly typing out in ways that isnt confusing and manner that is easily and clearly understood. That is no typos or missing words. Thank you

Now here are some fyi
1/ The Nephilims are not wrecking havoc today and the Nephilims can't wreck havoc today because the Nephilims were destroyed in the flood, do you remember that?
2/ If there were "the sons of God" and the daughters of men, there equally would exist too, "the sons of men" and the daughters of God. Maybe if you had, it would have made it easier to make the clear distinction.
3/ I dont think, you at all yourself, see the clear distinction and differences between these four categories of human beings, namely:
"the sons of God," "the sons of men," "the daughters of men," and "the daughters of God,"
"the sons of God" and the daughters of men.

EMILO2STAY:
Noah was a just man before God because he and his family was the only people then who believed and served the true God.

Thank you for your eventual attempt at answering the question.

Fyi EMILO2STAY, The wickedness in the land was increasingly becoming alarming and getting too much out of hand and God was about to set out send judgment upon the world and clear it of this wickedness and everyone in it, but then, Noah, a righteous man, blameless in his generation, and one who walked with God, found favour in the eyes of God because God noticed that, unlike everyone else, that unlike Noah's peers, his age mates, his generation, it was only Noah who made a personal decision not to have amorous relationships or make any amorous advances to the "the daughters of men" and so Noah because of this, is said in Genesis 6:8, to have found favour in the eyes of Jehovah and in Genesis 6:9, the Bible further said about Noah, to be "righteous," meaning having God's approval for Noah's action. Noah, incidentally, is the first person in biblical recording, to receive the honour of being credited with "righteous," and this, all for just an activity of faith of doing the right thing, it was all because of Noah not following the Jonesses and not doing what everyone else (e.g. other sons of God) were doing, and so we read it that, the act of Noah and to the glory of God, was accounted to Noah as righteousness.

Noah's family were the only people who believed that God was and is going to destroy their world and because they believed, they were saved and spared being destroyed. Noah's family had nothing to do with why Noah was considered righteous

EMILO2STAY, I am a strong believer in the saying that, advances are made by answering questions and discoveries are made by questioning answers, so if that maybe, then why not from this juncture, dont you grill me, ask me any question(s) under the sun that you think will clear things up, give more clarity and more illumination on the subject we are discussing here, hmm?

MuttleyLaff:
Who "grown man" epp? What has "grown man" got to do with anything that's being discussed here.

Please calm down and have it together to be correctly typing out in ways that isnt confusing and manner that is easily and clearly understood. That is no typos or missing words. Thank you

Now here are some fyi
1/ The Nephilims are not wrecking havoc today and the Nephilims can't wreck havoc today because the Nephilims were destroyed in the flood, do you remember that?
2/ If there were "the sons of God" and the daughters of men, there equally would exist too, "the sons of men" and the daughters of God. Maybe if you had, it would have made it easier to make the clear distinction.
3/ I dont think, you at all yourself, see the clear distinction and differences between these four categories of human beings, namely:
"the sons of God," "the sons of men," "the daughters of men," and "the daughters of God,"
"the sons of God" and the daughters of men.

Thank you for your eventual attempt at answering the question.

Fyi EMILO2STAY, The wickedness in the land was increasingly becoming alarming and getting too much out of hand and God was about to set out send judgment upon the world and clear it of this wickedness and everyone in it, but then, Noah, a righteous man, blameless in his generation, and one who walked with God, found favour in the eyes of God because God noticed that, unlike everyone else, that unlike Noah's peers, his age mates, his generation, it was only Noah who made a personal decision not to have amorous relationships or make any amorous advances to the "the daughters of men" and so Noah because of this, is said in Genesis 6:8, to have found favour in the eyes of Jehovah and in Genesis 6:9, the Bible further said about Noah, to be "righteous," meaning having God's approval for Noah's action. Noah, incidentally, is the first person in biblical recording, to receive the honour of being credited with "righteous," and this, all for just an activity of faith of doing the right thing, it was all because of Noah not following the Jonesses and not doing what everyone else (e.g. other sons of God) were doing, and so we read it that, the act of Noah and to the glory of God, was accounted to Noah as righteousness.

Noah's family were the only people who believed that God was and is going to destroy their world and because they believed, they were saved and spared being destroyed. Noah's family had nothing to do with why Noah was considered righteous

EMILO2STAY, I am a strong believer in the saying that, advances are made by answering questions and discoveries are made by questioning answers, so if that maybe, then why not from this juncture, dont you grill me, ask me any question(s) under the sun that you think will clear things up, give more clarity and more illumination on the subject we are discussing here, hmm?

is this some kind of joke?, where does the bible say Noah found favour in the sight of God because he refused the daughters of men.?, so in other words the nephilims were the son of who?, cain?. So this is the joke that you so long to say.
Any way this your theory is not and can never be supported by the scriptures.
So you trying to tell God destroyed the world because human men slept with human women?. I have heard this teaching before and it is heresy.

EMILO2STAY:
is this some kind of joke?, where does the bible say Noah found favour in the sight of God because he refused the daughters of men.?, so in other words the nephilims were the son of who?, cain?. So this is the joke that you so long to say.
Any way this your theory is not and can never be supported by the scriptures.
So you trying to tell God destroyed the world because human men slept with human women?. I have heard this teaching before and it is heresy.

EMILO2STAY, so you want to begin playing games huh? OK, two can play this game of yours. I too can play this game of yours by saying I too have heard the farcical story about angels having sexual intercourse with female human beings. Now you too, tell, where does the Bible emphatically say the sons of God are angels.

Answering your question about who the Nephilim were, the Nephilim, were off an extraction from Cain, same way the daughters of men were, whom the sons of God went into and having sexual carnal knowledge with, as opposed to going with the daughters of God.

MuttleyLaff:
EMILO2STAY, so you want to begin playing games huh? OK, two can play this game of yours. I too can play this game of yours by saying I too have heard the farcical story about angels having sexual intercourse with female human beings. Now you too, tell, where does the Bible emphatically say the sons of God are angels.

Answering your question about who the Nephilim were, the Nephilim, were off an extraction from Cain, same way the daughters of men were, whom the sons of God went into and having sexual carnal knowledge with, as opposed to going with the daughters of God.

your a big joke man
The book of job, 2peter, and even the book of enoch confirms it the sons of God were angels. Where is it mentioned in the bible the the nephilims were sons of cain as well as the daughters of men. Cain was just human, he killed his brother does not mean his offsprings will be wicked. Why didn't the bible just say the daughters of cain instead of the daughters of men. Noticed in what the bible said. "Genesis 6:1 And it came to pass, when Men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them.
Now tell me who does the "men"in genesis 6:1 refer to, cains descendants? Or the general population of the world then?.

EMILO2STAY:
your a big joke man

You're a greater and/or bigger joke than I could ever be. You just wait, you'll soon see and find out. You would eat your words and tender profuse apology for talking out of hand like this

EMILO2STAY:
The book of Job, 2 Peter, and even the book of Enoch confirms it the sons of God were angels

I have asked you to provide proof beyond reasonable doubt and with chapters and verses, but you've woefully been unable to say and show where or how you made out that sons of God are or equates to angels

The book of Job, hasn't got anything in it calling sons of God angels.

2 Peter, never said anything about sons of God being angels, but rather it is talking about fables and people like you believing in and spreading rumours that angels had sex with human beings

The book(s) of Enoch, right from the first century has been known to fake, this is why Peter and Jude, even Paul, were talking against it in their individual letters.

EMILO2STAY:
Where is it mentioned in the bible the the nephilims were sons of cain as well as the daughters of men. Cain was just human, he killed his brother does not mean his offsprings will be wicked

It is only a naïve person that will type such a comment like this.

EMILO2STAY:
Why didn't the bible just say the daughters of cain instead of the daughters of men

It doesn't diminish the fact and truth about the extraction of whom the daughters of men are. Wickedness started from Cain.

EMILO2STAY:
Noticed in what the bible said. "Genesis 6:1 And it came to pass, when Men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them.
Now tell me who does the "men"in genesis 6:1 refer to, cains descendants? Or the general population of the world then?.

The men in Genesis 6:1, refers to the combined lot of the sons of God and the sons of men, obviously encompasses the daughters of men and daughters of God

MuttleyLaff:
You're a greater and/or bigger joke than I could ever be. You just wait, you'll soon see and find out. You would eat your words and tender profuse apology for talking out of hand like this

I have asked to to provide proof beyond reasonable doubt and with chapters and verses, but you've woefully been unable to say and show where or how you made out that sons of God are or equates to angels

The book of Job, hasn't got anything in it calling sons of God angels.

2 Peter, never said anything about sons of God being angels, but rather it is talking about fables and people like you believing in and spreading rumours that angels had sex with human beings

The book(s) of Enoch, right from the first century has been known to fake, this is why Peter and Jude, even Paul, were talking against it in their individual letters.

It is only a naïve person that will type such a comment like this.

It doesn't diminish the fact and truth about the extraction of whom the daughters of men are. Wickedness started from Cain.

The men in Genesis 6:1, refers to the combined lot of the sons of God and the sons of men, obviously encompasses the daughters of men and daughters of God

here you go again typing too much with out a single proof. Honestly am tired of you. If you've got a point to make just go straight to it. go and read genesis 6:1to 2, then come back and apologize to me for the woeful answer about genesis 6:1you just gave me. Honestly muttleylaff I thought you were an intellectual and well versed in scripture but I know the kind of human being am dealing with now.

Did you know that the generations of cain were listed even before the generations of Seth? Why were they not called nephilim? Or sons of men? . You are the person who have not provided a concrete or even a single proof of this your sons of God daughters of men theory. I think your a true waste of time man.

Circuit3:


They were spirit. Genesis made it clear that they came down from heaven (What is a human being doing in heaven?) after they saw the daughters of men were fair (If they were humans, what is the big deal?) and the women bore giants. These giants were the nephilims.

Can you please show me where in scriptures it says that they 'came down from heaven'?

Circuit3:


The Sons of God a.k.a the Bene Elohims are celestial beings not humans.

A spirit can possess a human and take charge of the body and act as though it is human but that does not make it human.

But it is still a human body, no?

EMILO2STAY:
here you go again typing too much with out a single proof. Honestly am tired of you. If you've got a point to make just go straight to it.

I have asked you to provide proof beyond reasonable doubt and with chapters and verses, but you've woefully been unable to say and show where or how you made out that sons of God are or equates to angels and you now have the effrontery to claim you're tired etcetera. Smh.

EMILO2STAY:
go and read genesis 6:1 to 2, then come back and apologize to me for the woeful answer about genesis 6:1 you just gave me.

What point are you trying to make with Genesis 6:1-2. Spill it out, say exactly what you are trying to advance and insinuate with it now. Man up, tell the world

EMILO2STAY:
Honestly muttleylaff I thought you were an intellectual and well versed in scripture but I know the kind of human being am dealing with now.

Here is someone who has trouble telling his/her left from his/her right hand thinking he/her knows about another human being

EMILO2STAY:
Did you know that the generations of cain were listed even before the generations of Seth?

EMILO2STAY did you know that:
1/ The so called listed generations of Cain werent listed and done in good light, hmm?
2/ The so called listed generations of Cain werent at all featured nor mentioned in the book of the generations of Adam?
3/ There is nothing like or anything called "the generations of Seth".

EMILO2STAY:
Why were they not called nephilim? Or sons of men?. You are the person who have not provided a concrete or even a single proof of this your sons of God daughters of men theory.

I have answered your question about who the Nephilim were, when I said that the Nephilim, were off an extraction from Cain, the same way the daughters of men were, whom the sons of God (i.e. descendants of Seth) went into and having sexual carnal knowledge with, as opposed to going with the daughters of God (i.e. the descendants of Seth)

EMILO2STAY:
think your a true waste of time man.

EMILO2STAY, how tall were the Nephilim in the Book of Enoch? Dont give an answer, its a rhetorical question, and I will help with answering it and answer with proof:

"And they became pregnant, and they bare great giants, whose height was three thousand ells: Who consumed all the acquisitions of men. And when men could no longer sustain them, the giants turned against them and devoured mankind."
- the 7th chapter of the Book of Enoch

EMILO2STAY, fyi, an ancient ell is roughly a cubit or 18 inches. Therefore, the text actually is saying that these giants were 4,500 feet tall, as in nearly a mile tall. Some supporters of the extreme figures argue this is a textual error and that the verse should read 300 ells, or 450 feet, which is still a waste of time joke

If you ask for more, I can list you more waste of time jokes apart from the one above.

EMILO2STAY:
I can't believe what am what you just typed are you actually a grown man?.

Good question!

https://www.nairaland.com/5448144/book-enoch-reveals-much-unbelievable#82813216

MuttleyLaff:
I have asked you to provide proof beyond reasonable doubt and with chapters and verses, but you've woefully been unable to say and show where or how you made out that sons of God are or equates to angels and you now have the effrontery to claim you're tired etcetera. Smh.

What point are you trying to make with Genesis 6:1-2. Spill it out, say exactly what you are trying to advance and insinuate with it now. Man up, tell the world

Here is someone who has trouble telling his/her left from his/her right hand thinking he/her knows about another human being

EMILO2STAY did you know that:
1/ The so called listed generations of Cain werent listed and done in good light, hmm?
2/ The so called listed generations of Cain werent at all featured nor mentioned in the book of the generations of Adam?
3/ There is nothing like or anything called "the generations of Seth".

I have answered your question about who the Nephilim were, when I said that the Nephilim, were off an extraction from Cain, the same way the daughters of men were, whom the sons of God (i.e. descendants of Seth) went into and having sexual carnal knowledge with, as opposed to going with the daughters of God (i.e. the descendants of Seth)

EMILO2STAY, how tall were the Nephilim in the Book of Enoch? Dont give an answer, its a rhetorical question, and I will help with answering it and answer with proof:

"And they became pregnant, and they bare great giants, whose height was three thousand ells: Who consumed all the acquisitions of men. And when men could no longer sustain them, the giants turned against them and devoured mankind."
- the 7th chapter of the Book of Enoch

EMILO2STAY, fyi, an ancient ell is roughly a cubit or 18 inches. Therefore, the text actually is saying that these giants were 4,500 feet tall, as in nearly a mile tall. Some supporters of the extreme figures argue this is a textual error and that the verse should read 300 ells, or 450 feet, which is still a waste of time joke

If you ask for more, I can list you more waste of time jokes apart from the one above.

lol this man you suddenly woke up. I will address your mentions tomorrow. Oga I have given you proof beyond reasonable doubt the sons of God in genesis equates angels from the bible itself, the onus is on you to debunk it.
Were is your proof the sons of God are the children of cain?, you have resumed this your style of typing without making a point.
The reason I mentioned the generations of cain is show that there is no were in the bible they were referred to as sons of men or daughters of men according to you wether they were portrayed in good light or not. Or are you saying that in the entire generations of Adam no one killed a man?. You see why I called you a waste of my time..
And you haven't answered zilch of my questions. I said prove from the Bible that the nephilims come from cain descendants, show biblical proof. show were it is stated in the bible Mr false prophet. I see you twisting the scriptures to fit your view.

wether an ancient ell is 18 inches or not the fact remains there is more than enough proof a race of giants once roamed the earth.

EMILO2STAY:
lol this man you suddenly woke up. I will address your mentions tomorrow.

I light years ago stayed woke nwanne. It is about time you too stay woke. I forgot this thread on the back burner, only for OpenYourEyes1 to remind me of it with the "Book Of Enoch Reveals So Much. It's So Unbelievable!" thread below:
https://www.nairaland.com/5448144/book-enoch-reveals-much-unbelievable

EMILO2STAY, when you do come back to address, just remember that, I said the mention of the descendants of Cain was not done in good light. Take for example, talking about the immediate descendants of Cain, like Lamech, who was the first to take two wives, and thus was the first to prepare the way for polygamy. The same Lamech admitted to killing another man, just like his great, great, great, great great grandfather Cain. Jubal, who was Lamech's son, was the father of all who play the harp and flute, only that, the music that was made didnt have God in any of their melodies. They devised their harps and the organs, to shut God out. Lamech was also the father of Tubal-cain, the inventor of warfare and dangerous other weapons.I can give other examples of Cain's descendants behaving badly. In fact, the seven generations of Cain, are perceived as the brood of Satan, and accordingly represented themselves, as types of rebels.

MuttleyLaff:
I light years ago stayed woke nwanne. It is about time you too stay woke. I forgot this thread on the back burner, only for OpenYourEyes1 to remind me of it with the "Book Of Enoch Reveals So Much. It's So Unbelievable!" thread below:
https://www.nairaland.com/5448144/book-enoch-reveals-much-unbelievable

EMILO2STAY, when you do come back to address, just remember that, I said the mention of the descendants of Cain was not done in good light. Take for example, talking about the immediate descendants of Cain, like Lamech, who was the first to take two wives, and thus was the first to prepare the way for polygamy. The same Lamech admitted to killing another man, just like his great, great, great, great great grandfather Cain. Jubal, who was Lamech's son, was the father of all who play the harp and flute, only that, the music that was made didnt have God in any of their melodies. They devised their harps and the organs, to shut God out. Lamech was also the father of Tubal-cain, the inventor of warfare and dangerous other weapons.I can give other examples of Cain's descendants behaving badly. In fact, the seven generations of Cain, are perceived as the brood of Satan, and accordingly represented themselves, as types of rebels.

it wasn't done in good light so that means they are the sons/daughters of men and the reason they begat nephilim., so any one today whose great grand father was a murderer will become sons /daughters of men and will begat a nephilim..... What a joke of a man.

EMILO2STAY:
it wasn't done in good light so that means they are the sons/daughters of men and the reason they begat nephilim., so any one today whose great grand father was a murderer will become sons /daughters of men and will begat a nephilim..... What a joke of a man.

The one and only joke here is your pitiful comical self. Please why don't you further amuse me with telling who were the daughters of men, hmm?

EMILO2STAY, stick to the matter and person we are discussing here. May I remind you, it is Cain and no other persons. We are discussing the antecedents of Cain and his descendants. It was because of the bad influence and increasingly bad behaviour that the world was destroyed with a flood.

MuttleyLaff:
The one and only joke here is your pitiful comical self. Please why don't you further amuse me with telling who were the daughters of men, hmm?

EMILO2STAY, stick to the matter and person we are discussing here. May I remind you, it is Cain and no other persons. We are discussing the antecedents of Cain and his descendants. It was because of the bad influence and increasingly bad behaviour that the world was destroyed with a flood.

and you have failed to mention the portion of the Bible that that states cain descendants are the reason for the nephilims and the flood. You have also failed to prove in any way at all that the sons of God in genesis is talking about the children of seth as you claim. Proof!!!! That is all I need, not not pointless ranting Mr waste of time.

EMILO2STAY:
That is all I need, not not pointless ranting Mr waste of time.

Word diarrhea of the yadayada type is what he's known for. He drowns his sense in his poo.

https://www.nairaland.com/5448144/book-enoch-reveals-much-unbelievable#82827196

budaatum:
Word diarrhea of the yadayada type is what he's known for. He drowns his sense in his poo.

https://www.nairaland.com/5448144/book-enoch-reveals-much-unbelievable#82827196

baba, piss off, "a ma peyin, to ba kan yin, agba ntara shọbọlọkọ" poking nose into not where called into. I thought you were a sensible person. I now withdraw my apology to you earlier today. I'll go and cross it out now. Mtcheew

EMILO2STAY:
and you have failed to mention the portion of the Bible that that states cain descendants are the reason for the nephilims and the flood. You have also failed to prove in any way at all that the sons of God in genesis is talking about the children of seth as you claim. Proof!!!! That is all I need, not not pointless ranting Mr waste of time.

I do recall, if you don't anymore remember, that I earlier have asked you to provide proof beyond reasonable doubt and with chapters and verses, but you've woefully been unable to say and show where or how you made out that sons of God are and/or equates to angels, but now you have the gall to be contesting that Cain's descendants are not the sons of men and/or daughters of men

As you can see MuttleyLaff, I'm not the only one telling you about your excessive wordiness. Must be because you think you deserve that much of ones time.

We are telling you that you don't deserve the amount of ones time that you think you do when you do not use your brain.

budaatum:
As you can see MuttleyLaff, I'm not the only one telling you about your excessive wordiness. Must be because you think you deserve that much of ones time.

We are telling you that you don't deserve the amount of ones time that you think you do when you do not use your brain.

Dumb and dumber. Why arent I not surprised that birds of the same feather flock together to side each other, erhn? "Adiẹ funfun, ti o mọ ara lagba" White feathered fowl that's behaving badly and not acting its age

MuttleyLaff:
I do recall, if you don't anymore remember, that I earlier have asked you to provide proof beyond reasonable doubt and with chapters and verses, but you've woefully been unable to say and show where or how you made out that sons of God are and/or equates to angels, but now you have the gall to be contesting that Cain's descendants are not the sons of men and/or daughters of men

still going in circles?,... I give up Mr man.

You and I.