Is it by force to comment

That's what happens when bubu tries to respond to messages as Garba shehu went out

SLAP44:
That's what happens when bubu tries to respond to messages as Garba shehu went out

I won't forgive you bro for successfully turning me into a mad man in the restroom right now.
A good laugh is therapeutic though.

This is an example of the kind of minds that support the failed BUHARI

J111333:
I won't forgive you bro for successfully turning me into a mad man in the restroom right now.
A good laugh is a therapeutic though.

So you are out drinking ko?

he end up disgracing himself. what a grammatical misfortune......

Wonderful! What language is that?
Is that Swahili?

Wiifesnatcher:
he end ended up disgracing himself. what a grammatical misfortune......

Fixed.

SLAP44:
That's what happens when bubu tries to respond to messages as Garba shehu went out

Grammatically, the texts in bold are not in agreement.

Coincidentally, the Bubu you tried to mock has never committed such grammatical blunders. Pls I stand to be corrected with proof, not just empty ramblings.

Simplyleo:

Grammatically, the texts in bold are not in agreement.

Coincidentally, the Bubu you tried to mock has never committed such grammatical blunders. Pls I stand to be corrected with proof, not just empty ramblings.

Why don't you take that same sentence and correct it let's see since you say they are not in agreement

Simplyleo:
Hmmm

You sef fear grammar by a fellow Buharist

FarahAideed:


Why don't you take that same sentence and correct it let's see since you say they are not in agreement

Okay.

SLAP44:
That's what happens when bubu tries to respond to messages as Garba shehu went goes out

Or

SLAP44:
That's what happens happened when bubu tries tried to respond to messages as Garba shehu went out

Done?

In English grammar, a word called "concord", exists, go and find out. And for you not to have seen these crystal clear grammatical errors says a lot about your literacy.

FarahAideed:


You sef fear grammar by a fellow Buharist

Grammar by a fellow Buharist?

Do you want us to start bringing out grammar by fellow atikoolooters?

Mistakes made by everyone everyday and no one cares, they are now making a mountain out of mole hill of it. This is what happens when one searches for something that doesn't exist.

Simplyleo:

Okay.



Or

Done?

In English grammar, a word called "concord", exists, go and find out. And for you not to have seen these crystal clear grammatical errors says a lot about your literacy.

You claim to be well lettered in grammar concord yet your so called correction is filled with discords & syntax errors . SMH

FarahAideed:



You claim to be well lettered in grammar concord yet your so called correction is filled with discords & syntax errors . SMH

Pls bring out those "discords & syntax" errors let's see.

At least you challenged me to correct the sentence and I took up the challenge. Now do same if you are not an illiterate abusing words.

Simplyleo:

Pls bring them out let's see.

At least you challenged me to correct the statement and I took the challenge. Now do same if you are not an illiterate.

What has being a " man" have to do with this? You Buharists and your misogynistic minds are appalling. I will not be drawn into misogyny driven situation sir .

[s]

FarahAideed:


What has being a " man" have to do with this? You Buharists and your misogynistic minds are appalling. I will not be drawn into misogyny driven situation sir .

[/s]
Oga, bring out those "discords & syntax" errors let's see, if you not an illiterate trying to abuse words.

You challenged me and I took up the challenge, so I expect you to reciprocate accordingly rather than this lame attempt at digressing.

Besides, I never asked if you are a man, what I asked is if you are not an illiterate.

Now, let me correct you again.

The first line in this your jaundiced response should be; "what has being a man got to do with..."

And you have the guts to describe Buhari as an illiterate. Smh.

Simplyleo:

Pls bring out those "discords & syntax" errors let's see.

At least you challenged me to correct the sentence and I took up the challenge. Now do same if you are not an illiterate abusing words.

See what you wrote below

That's what happened when bubu tried to respond to messages as Garba shehu went out

The apt syntax and concord should be ;

"That's what happens when Bubu tries to respond to messages himself when Garba Shehu is not around ."

You instead opted to use the word "happened" in discord to the entire direction of Slap44's comment intent which was suggesting likelihood of an event and not an actual event that has "happened "

[s]

FarahAideed:


See what you wrote below



The apt syntax and concord should be ;

"That's what happens when Bubu tries to respond to messages himself when Garba Shehu is not around ."

You instead opted to use the word "happened" in discord to the entire direction of Slap44's comment intent which was suggesting likelihood of an event and not an actual event that has "happened "

[/s]
Oga, I gave two options (which are both grammatically correct) but you decided to quote one where you think a hole exists. In the two options, one is in simple present, the other in simple past. The comment I initially quoted has a mixture of present and past which negates the rule of concord.

You are here now adding and subtracting ("himself" & "not around" ) in an attempt to claim there is an error. Niggah, my intention was never to change his comment but to point out the grammatical errors and that is exactly what I did.

And incidentally, the one that suits this your explanation was the first but you deliberately skipped it and went for the one you think is incorrect.

Here it is again in case you deliberately went blind.

SLAP44:
That's what happens when bubu tries to respond to messages as Garba shehu went goes out

Now let me correct you again.

"That's what happens when Bubu tries to respond to messages himself when Garba Shehu is not around ."

When when when everywhere. Very bad writing skill. Next time, change either of the "whens" to "whenever".

A single message can be written in more than a million ways, so your attempt at changing the context thereby making a claim of picking errors is nothing but bunkum.

Make I no comment Wetin dey my mind

Grammernazi coman see o, Simplyleo & FarahAideed don turn small joke to grammar contest!

...educative though, especially for our NLders way sabi mix up their tenses.

FarahAideed is correct. Simple

FarahAideed:


So you are out drinking ko?

Nay, just using restroom.


Wait a minute, y'all haff turned this thread to an Engirish class without realising there are some illiterates like me here.
I'm outta here.

pig reno

I'll be back soon

gunuvi:
FarahAideed is correct. Simple

Totally wrong. He was just trying to play smart but got his ass whopped by Simplyleo.

Sad: breaking news

English language died at the hands of one twitter user (name withheld)while replying renoomokri and will be laid to rest in its hometown in England.

Cause of death: still undergoing autopsy.

Time of death: still unknown

Killer: still at large.

Lol

Simplyleo:
[s][/s]
Oga, I gave two options (which are both grammatically correct) but you decided to quote one where you think a hole exists. In the two options, one is in simple present, the other in simple past. The comment I initially quoted has a mixture of present and past which negates the rule of concord.

You are here now adding and subtracting ("himself" & "not around" ) in an attempt to claim there is an error. Niggah, my intention was never to change his comment but to point out the grammatical errors and that is exactly what I did.

And incidentally, the one that suits this your explanation was the first but you deliberately skipped it and went for the one you think is incorrect.

Here it is again in case you deliberately went blind.


Now let me correct you again.


When when when everywhere. Very bad writing skill. Next time, change either of the "whens" to "whenever".

A single message can be written in more than a million ways, so your attempt at changing the context thereby making a claim of picking errors is nothing but bunkum.

Come on come on