Xposed2020:


That's what the SC is saying. His pleadings was not about elections not holding in 388 PUs, Rather its about wrong imputation of his votes as against what the two courts assumed. And to prove that, he brought duplicates given to him at the ward collation centres which the police gave theirs too but about 20 are missing. Now all INEC has to do is bring the authentic copies to disprove Hope and it failed to do.

So in essence you agree Uzodimma could not prove that elections held in the 388 units.Thank you.That is all I want to hear

adanny01:


Was that in contention? Uzodinma's case was simple, my results were not counted, court count them, these my evidence. INEC said the evidence is fake but didn't provide proof. At what point do you want Uzodinma to proof election held. Uzodinma is the appellant, his case wasn't based on whether election held or not. His case, is based on the fact that duly counted votes were excluded. To proof that, he just had to provide the polling unit result sheet, police provide theirs and even if INEC calls it forged, it doesn't matter.

did Uzodimma prove the documents eh tendered were authentic?? did he prove that voting were conducted in all 388 polling units!!!.

INEC here is not PDP and if they failed to tender results, then the fault lies with INEC of not being neutral,
they have been given all the tools to make election.
neither PDP or APC has the power to provide election results. If INEC refused to provide election results in its database , then it means there was no election. else another party say AAP will also come up with a result and If INEC also does not provide results are we going to declare them as winners
the ruling should have been to compel INEC to provide all results on the table both valid and invalid, and then ask for which results are cancelled and follow the election act to decide which is.

Something is fishy to me

PaChukwudi44:


so Uzodimma who introduced teh new documents have no burden to proof it is real

Buhari has no certificate, who has burden of proof, Buhari or the person who says Buhari has no certificate?

Uzodinma says his votes were not counted he gave his reasons, the burden of proof that his reasons are fake are on the person who says they are fake, thats INEC.

NORSYK:


Supreme Court had ruled that once the number of votes exceeded the number of accredited voters it was over voting... So what happened to this case that the number of votes were in over 100,000 above the accredited voters

The supreme course never said so.it seems you dont pay attention to details.it said overvoting is if votes exceed total registered votes or ticked accreditations in the manual register not card readers

PaChukwudi44:


did Uzodimma prove that the so called cancelled votes were from INEC?

Uzodinma does not need to prove anything because Inec verbally claimed it was fake and forged yet were unable to physically prove it was fake and forged.

I will ask you again, if I present an alleged forged and fake school certificate to you and you claim it is fake and forged should you not be able to back up your verbal claim with actual physical evidence why it is fake and forged?

If you cannot, how then did you arrive at the verbal conclusion that my certificate is fake and forged?

Is your brain under your feet? E be like say you dey step on am every day and now the thing done spoil

NORSYK:


OK, let's assume that Supreme Court was right to admit the results even though (they have no rights of collation of results and shouldn't have admitted those results), what did supreme court do when they found out that they number of accredited voters were higher than that of the total votes with excess over 102,000 ? what did they do when they found that only 1 candidate had all the votes in all 388 polling units where over 70 candidates contested in the same election?
What did the supreme Court do when the know that each polling units has the maximum number of 500 votes and do not exceed 500, but according to the supreme Court calculation 500*388=213,000

Oga,many polling units have more than 1000 voters and they are subdivided into voting points under same units.
I already explained what overvoting is.in the judgment,it was stated that ihedioha scored 1903 votes in those units

PaChukwudi44:


lol how many witnesses were called for the 388 polling units You people must think you are talking to fools

Up uzodinma,up apc

garfield1:

The supreme course never said so.it seems you dont pay attention to details.it said overvoting is if votes exceed total registered votes or ticked accreditations in the manual register not card readers

Why was Dino election annulled?

maestroferdi:
Voodoo logic...

You are making a fool of yourself, dude.

Its you my boy.nothing makes meaning to a man always making sounds full fury and noise pertaining to nut

danie09:
To me ihedioha should hold his lawyers for deliberate sabotage ,his legal team and inec's legal teams are the biggest criminals in this case.
Hope was smart
The supreme court was factual they played by the book
Ihedioha's and inec's legal teams are either dumb or corrupt but my instincts said the later is the right option here.

Fine.

Blindersoff:


[b]Uzodinma does not need to prove anything [/b]because Inec verbally claimed it was fake and forged yet were unable to physically prove it was fake and forged.

I will ask you again, if I present an alleged forged and fake school certificate to you and you claim it is fake and forged should you not be able to back up your verbal claim with actual physical evidence why it is fake and forged?

If you cannot, how then did you arrive at the verbal conclusion that my certificate is fake and forged?

Is your brain under your feet? E be like say you dey step on am every day and now the thing done spoil

i stopped reading here

Blindersoff:


This mindset right here is the reason you always lose. You reason from the bottom of an empty barrel.

How can you say the one who does not hold the original copies should prove his copies are not fake when the body which holds the original copies could not even produce the original copies to disprove Uzodinma?

What manner of education did you get in your life nwokem chukwudi? Inapu Ara?

who exactly do I always lose to ? Your ancestors?

maestroferdi:
What are you proving?

They said the result did not emanate from them.

Did the CJN conduct a forensic scrutiny to ascertain whether the result is forged?

What this senseless attempt at proffering an explanation ended up achieving was to disdainfully insult the intelligence of all right-thinking people.

Now that they have spoken, no scintilla of doubt is still remaining...

You are a lost cause who knows nothing about law.you are just empty.
In the court,it is not enough to deny but must do so through documentary evidence or verbally ad idem and viva voce.
It is not the place of the judges to conduct any forensic scrutiny but the place of inec and ihedioha to do that and not mere denials boy

garfield1:

Up uzodinma,up apc

thats excatly how we know the among of grey matter in the skull.

PaChukwudi44:


i stopped reading here

Because that is the truth. His case was simple.

HOPE UZODINMA: My results were omitted because they got erroneously cancelled and I hereby present proof of the results which were cancelled. These are duly signed copies.

INEC and IHEDIOHA jump up and say these documents are fake and forged.

SUPREME COURT: Do you have evidence proving they are fake and forged?

INEC AND IHEDIOHA : emm emm emm all we know is that they are fake and forged.

SUPREME COURT: You guys are obviously unserious. How can you claim the tendered documents are fake and forged yet cannot provide evidence which proves your claim?

Pachukwudi you see I had to turn it into a little drama for kids so that your little brain can adequately picture what happened.

I just might have reason to believe now that sense is very far from you

PaChukwudi44:


So in essence you agree Uzodimma could not prove that elections held in the 388 units.Thank you.That is all I want to hear

Election holding or not holding at 388 PUs was never a contention before the courts.

Staro:

TANKO is a disgrace to
Nigeria's judiciary

You will be fine last last

NORSYK:


Why was Dino election annulled?

I dont have the details but from the little i read,it ranged from overvoting,rigging etc.it was cancelled by the appeal court not supreme court

Xposed2020:


Election holding or not holding at 388 PUs was never a contention before the courts.

Forget that loser

PaChukwudi44:


thats excatly how we know the among of grey matter in the skull.

When you failed to read the pleadings of an appellant and marry it with the defence of the respondents but chose to comment out of ignorance,this is what you will get

[s]

divicode:


You will be fine last last

[/s]

BiafraforTrump:


We have seen the over developed states of Osun, Ekiti and Ondo(bankrupt).

and how does that consigns me?
I'm from South South

Ebenezar2020:
and how does that consigns me?
I'm from South South

Afonja Primitive pig.

Fulani talk am......

garfield1:

You are a lost cause who knows nothing about law.you are just empty.
In the court,it is not enough to deny but must do so through documentary evidence or verbally ad idem and viva voce.
It is not the place of the judges to conduct any forensic scrutiny but the place of inec and ihedioha to do that and not mere denials boy

You are an incorrigible ignoramus.

Do I need to organize a crash course for you on how the legal process plays out?

The CJN was supposed to be a disinterested party here and operate solely functus officio. Does it stand to reason that the PDP legal team failed to spot the banalities you are concocting/dredging up to waste my time?

Even an aspiring law student can see through the charade of a supposed judgement.

In any case, Ihedioha made a public statement disavowing the abracadabra issued by the CJN/Supreme Court. I hope you were not expecting his legal team to go public with what transpired in the spectacle given the constraints they are encumbered with professionally speaking...

The fact that you are averring that an arbiter should willfully advance a position that is both factually and legally untenable says all that needs to be known about you...

maestroferdi:
You are an incorrigible ignoramus.

Do I need to organize a crash course for you on how the legal process plays out?

The CJN was supposed to be a disinterested party here and operate solely functus officio. Does it stand to reason that the PDP legal team failed to spot the banalities you are concocting/dredging up to waste my time?

Even an aspiring law student can see through the charade of a supposed judgement.

In any case, Ihedioha made a public statement disavowing the abracadabra issued by the CJN/Supreme Court. I hope you were not expecting his legal team to go public with what transpired in the spectacle given the constraints they are encumbered with professionally speaking...

The fact that you are averring that an arbiter should willfully advance a position that is both factually and legally untenable says all needs to be known about you...

Pure rubbish

ON ADMITTING THE DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BY POLICE

The appeal court had in its ruling held that the election documents tendered as exhibits by PW54, a deputy commissioner of police, cannot be admitted as evidence.

But the supreme court overruled the lower court.

It agreed with Uzodinma’s counsel that contrary to the decision of the appellate court, the documents tendered “being duplicate originals” do not require any certification.

“The tendering of exhibits PPP1 – PPP366 through PW54 was to show that the scores recorded therein were excluded from from the forms EC8B (ward collation results).

“The respondents failed to prove that the documents were fake or forged.”

https://www.thecable.ng/scourt-why-we-accepted-materials-tendered-by-uzodinma-police[/quote]




EVERYBODY ON HERE HAVE FORGOTTEN ABOUT THE LAST PARAGRAPH! THIS IS PURE FRAUD ! MY LAWYER FRIEND SAID THIS IS NOT THE SUPREME COURT THIS ARE JUST BUNCH OF STOOGES PIUT IN THERE TO DO THE BIDDING OF WHOEVER PUT THEM THERE

Ihedioha should go and rest please!


Imo is APC

APC is Imo

dante0147:


ON ADMITTING THE DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BY POLICE

The appeal court had in its ruling held that the election documents tendered as exhibits by PW54, a deputy commissioner of police, cannot be admitted as evidence.

But the supreme court overruled the lower court.

It agreed with Uzodinma’s counsel that contrary to the decision of the appellate court, the documents tendered “being duplicate originals” do not require any certification.

“The tendering of exhibits PPP1 – PPP366 through PW54 was to show that the scores recorded therein were excluded from from the forms EC8B (ward collation results).

“The respondents failed to prove that the documents were fake or forged.”

https://www.thecable.ng/scourt-why-we-accepted-materials-tendered-by-uzodinma-police




EVERYBODY ON HERE HAVE FORGOTTEN ABOUT THE LAST PARAGRAPH! THIS IS PURE FRAUD ! MY LAWYER FRIEND SAID THIS IS NOT THE SUPREME COURT THIS ARE JUST BUNCH OF STOOGES PIUT IN THERE TO DO THE BIDDING OF WHOEVER PUT THEM THERE

Your friend is a quack lawyer.

Charge and bail lawyer

Staro:

TANKO is a disgrace to
Nigeria's judiciary

You can't wail at this pace till 2023.

Staro:

TANKO is a disgrace to
Nigeria's judiciary

It is INEC that is the real disgrace. Tank worked on the evidence presented before them, INEC and PDP could not defend if those evidence were false. Bravo to our Judiciary.

PaChukwudi44:


i stopped reading here

I just read the 45pages of the judgement.

You need to read it and stop sharing ignorance on Nairaland.

INEC called Uzodinma's Duplicate original copies fake but didn't even bring the originals. The police were subpoenaed to provide their own Duplicate original and they did while INEC didn't provide even one original nor called a single witness.