Dtruthspeaker:


Who reputated the journals, you right?

Did you read the "reputable journals" themselves or you got them from "quack websites"?

Who "quacked" the websites, you right?

You are only showing your support to the evidence in support of what you choose to believe in and not proving and establishing the theory yourself, by yourself, since you have accepted it's truth of it, therefore you must be a able to reasonable and validly show the Truth of it., BEYOND ALL REASONABLE DOUBT!

This is like building on sand. You claim I am the arbiter of websites which is already wrong.

Secondly, when are going to be able to do same for your bible?

LordReed:


This is like building on sand. You claim I am the arbiter of websites which is already wrong.

No I did not build any thing, nor make a claim.

I simply pointed out that you are being your own judge in your own case, which you ought not to do.

LordReed:

Secondly, when are going to be able to do same for your bible?

I already do that and NO ONE HAS ANY GOOD REASON REMAINING when they do challenge my presentation.

Dtruthspeaker:


No I did not build any thing, nor make a claim.

I simply pointed out that you are being your own judge in your own case, which you ought not to do.

I never said I judged the websites so you are the one making that claim.

I already do that and NO ONE HAS ANY GOOD REASON REMAINING when they do challenge my presentation.

Sure, you will claim you did in some place you can't remember and when I ask you to replicate it you'll claim its too much work. Am I right? LoL!

The truth of the matter is that nobody on this planet today saw any BIG BANG happen neither did any saw snake talking to a woman.
So we can't just raise an idea to counter another when both are still on probation!

Those that agree with Creation need to prove it by working out something benefitial so that everyone can see that they truly know what they're saying, and the same applies to those trusting in the idea of a BIG BANG!

LordReed:

I never said I judged the websites so you are the one making that claim.

Is this not the Judgement you passed?

"Go read reputable scientific journals not quack websites.

Which is why I said "You, Reputated them and You Quacked them

LordReed:

Sure, you will claim you did in some place you can't remember and when I ask you to replicate it you'll claim its too much work. Am I right? LoL!

What I did then, I am still doing even today when the matters arise, so I am always open for valid evaluations.

Dtruthspeaker:


Is this not the Judgement you passed?

"Go read reputable scientific journals not quack websites.

Which is why I said "You, Reputated them and You Quacked them

Where in what I wrote does it say that? You are making a claim not supported by the evidence.

What I did then, I am still doing even today when the matters arise, so I am always open for valid evaluations.

Ok so tell me how you evaluated the Bible and know beyond reasonable doubt that it is what you think it is.

LordReed:

Where in what I wrote does it say that?

Even when I have shown you via the highlights that it is you who Judged them "Reputable" and "Quack".

Do you see the kind of person you are?

Even in this simple debate, you raise unnecessary issues always immediately ready to deny and abandon your words and the effects thereof, when it is against you.

Yet you would want people to think that you are a reasonable person?

But You are not, once it is against you!

Which is the futility of having a reasonable debate with you.

falcon01:
Making the big bang happen

I love your answer and it's even the right answer. But as for all these gods like Jehovah and Allah, they were created even through the bangs.

Dtruthspeaker:


Even when I have shown you via the highlights that it is you who Judged them "Reputable" and "Quack".

Do you see the kind of person you are?

Even in this simple debate, you raise unnecessary issues always immediately ready to deny and abandon your words and the effects thereof, when it is against you.

Yet you would want people to think that you are a reasonable person?

But You are not, once it is against you!

Which is the futility of having a reasonable debate with you.

I wrote read reputable journals and you are claiming I am the one who judged them reputable. You have no leg to stand on or maybe you don't understand how English works.

Na so you take style dodge the evaluation of Bible o. Artful dodger. LMFAO!

LordReed:


I wrote read reputable journals and you are claiming I am the one who judged them reputable. You have no leg to stand on or maybe you don't understand how English works.

Na so you take style dodge the evaluation of Bible o. Artful dodger. LMFAO!

Lol, reed has been reading from me definitely but refuses to learn.

LordReed:

I wrote read reputable journals and you are claiming I am the one who judged them reputable. You have no leg to stand on or maybe you don't understand how English works.

Na so you take style dodge the evaluation of Bible o. Artful dodger. LMFAO!

Now you have Moved from implying that you did not judge the source of information but now that I have proven it to you, You have now moved to "I merely advice reading reputable journal" (NOW CONVENIENTLY OMITTING YOUR JUDGEMENT OF"QUACK WEBSITES" ) whereas your spirit (tone) commanded that guy to "read only the reputable journals you approve as you already know which supports your case, while commanding him to disregard all other sources which oppose your case calling them "Quack Websites".

So, you are the coily serpent always and did I not say you will deny your words and the effects thereof, when it is against you?

Now, you prove the Truth of it

Anyway, so as long as it is written in here you said "reputable" journals and "quack websites" my case is proven.

Dtruthspeaker:


Now you have Moved from implying that you did not judge the source of information but now that I have proven it to you, You have now moved to "I merely advice reading reputable journal" (NOW CONVENIENTLY OMITTING YOUR JUDGEMENT OF"QUACK WEBSITES" ) whereas your spirit (tone) commanded that guy to "read only the reputable journals you approve as you already know which supports your case, while commanding him to disregard all other sources which oppose your case calling them "Quack Websites".

So, you are the coily serpent always.

So as long as it is written you said "reputable" journals and "quack websites" my case is proven.

You case is at the bottom of the lagoon. Meanwhile keep dodging, we see you in 4d. LMFAO!

LordReed:


You case is at the bottom of the lagoon. Meanwhile keep dodging, we see you in 4d. LMFAO!

This your obsessive investment on dtruth, aren't you going to consider it a waste just yet?

Image123:


This your obsessive investment on dtruth, aren't you going to consider it a waste just yet?

This evil thinks that by having the last post in a debate, he can swallow up a soul.

LordReed:

You case is at the bottom of the lagoon. Meanwhile keep dodging, we see you in 4d. LMFAO!

The only thing you can say now, when you do not have any valid counter, as Always!!!

Dtruthspeaker:


The only thing you can say now, when you do not have any valid counter, as Always!!!

LoL! You obviously don't know the meaning of reputable or else you won't have been making all this noise.

When are you going to show me how you evaluated the Bible to be all you claim it to be. Artful dodger. LMFAO!

IamMichael:
I would really like to know the answer to this question. Anyone?

When did the big bang happen?

IamMichael:
I would really like to know the answer to this question. Anyone?

----

Is this a serious question? What "big bang"? Nothing + nothing x nothing = nothing!

"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made." - John 1:1-3

"Thus the heavens and the earth, and all the host of them, were finished. And on the seventh day God ended His work which He had done, and He rested on the seventh day from all His work which He had done." - Genesis 2:1-2

"For by Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through Him and for Him." - Colossians 1:16

+++

"For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse, because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Professing to be wise, they became fools,..." - Romans 1:20-22

xproducer:


----

Is this a serious question? What "big bang"? Nothing + nothing x nothing = nothing!

What you should seriously do is understand what the BBT is before talking ignorantly. Nobody but ignorant folk describe the BBT as nothing that went bang.

KaideeGee:
For goodness sake, please humans, open your eyes, science as we know it is nothing but a system of belief. Just like Hinduism, confucianism, and any other thing on that list.
It's better you take science with a pinch of salt.

What a moronic statement!
God! Statements like this is the reason why Africa is so backward.

LordReed:


LoL! You obviously don't know the meaning of reputable or else you won't have been making all this noise.

Changing Post Again! Now it is about the word Reputable.

As long as you are not the one doing the "reputating".

LordReed:

When are you going to show me how you evaluated the Bible to be all you claim it to be. Artful dodger. LMFAO!

As I said earlier, What I did then, I am doing even now and you can come and make your valid evaluations if you have any.

Dtruthspeaker:


Changing Post Again! Now it is about the word Reputable.

As long as you are not the one doing the "reputating".

Clown. I wrote read reputable journals and here you are saying its not about the word reputable. LMAO!

As I said earlier, What I did then, I am doing even now and you can come and make your valid evaluations if you have any.

I asked how you evaluated the Bible to make sure it was all you claim it to be, has nothing to do with me evaluating.

LordReed:


What you should seriously do is understand what the BBT is before talking ignorantly. Nobody but ignorant folk describe the BBT as nothing that went bang.

It's an unproven unprovable unrepeatable theory nonetheless. Only useful for passing exams, that's all. Oh, also for deluding atheists and wannabe atheists.

IamMichael:

Where is that?

How many places do you know pass your village? If they tell you where, you want to visit Him ni?

IamMichael:

Science doesn't claim to know, but rather seeks to know by applying a systematic process of investigation and analysis based on available facts. At all times, Science stands to be corrected unlike religion.

Religion claims to know. Yet, for two thousand years it can't prove the existence of the mental construct it preaches to adherents.

Okay, science doesn't know but we must accept what science doesn't know, right?

LordReed:

Clown. I wrote read reputable journals and here you are saying its not about the word reputable. LMAO!

I did not say, you did not say so.

LordReed:

I asked how you evaluated the Bible to make sure it was all you claim it to be, has nothing to do with me evaluating.

Simple! Immediately I learnt any subject I applied and tested it against the Bible to know if it is True.

And they all authenticate the Truth of the Bible.

But this is not for you, for even the ground under your feet, you will deny when it is against you, exactly as Satan, the King of Lies and Deny-yer of Truth.

Dtruthspeaker:


I did not say, you did not say so.

You said I judged them reputable, do you know the meaning of reputable, if you did you won't have said what you said.

Simple! Immediately I learnt any subject I applied and tested it against the Bible to know if it is True.

And they all authenticate the Truth of the Bible.

But this is not for you, for even the ground under your feet, you will deny when it is against you, exactly as Satan, the King of Lies and Deny-yer of Truth.

Give an example of a subject you applied and how it authenticated the truth of the Bible.

LordReed:

You said I judged them reputable, do you know the meaning of reputable, if you did you won't have said what you said.

still gnawing on that bone. Another Change of Post. Meaning of Reputable was not in issue.

LordReed:

Give an example of a subject you applied and how it authenticated the truth of the Bible.

I know you are evil and Satan himself and you are not asking these questions to know The Truth but rather to see if you can get to the source of my Knowledge, you would be able to find or create a valid counter to me, and thereby make me fall

God Established Truth to be Immovable so, you are wasting your time and you will and must remain the-evil that you are.

So, I'll tell you, just to show others (for you know already being Satan's Avatar) that there is Absolutely No Way you can validly challenge Any and All of The Truths God Established since the beginning to last till the end of this world.

Proof of God was already settled for me (for I heard from Him) so I knew He was there but I did not know How to Prove He was to another.

And This where Law is King for Proof of Truth can ONLY BE REASONABLE AND BEYOND ALL REASONABLE DOUBT BE PROVEN BY LAW , ORDINARY NATURAL LIVING AND KNOWLEDGE OF LAW..

THERE IS NO OTHER WAY BESIDES THESE.

Thinkings and philosophy all stand or fall by Law.

And it takes approximately 10 years to become an expert in Law, so it is impossible for me to present my authentication outside a debate.

Now, it is only by debates you would see how a Truth is Established and how the Liar or the Untruthful can not validly rebut.

Neither could be prove his case when given the witness box.

Lies and Liars can never ever prove their cases before me and generally before Lawyers.

Only Truth Stands!

Dtruthspeaker:


still gnawing on that bone. Another Change of Post. Meaning of Reputable was not in issue.

It is the issue, if you knew the meaning you'd not be saying I reputated it. LoL!

I know you are evil and Satan himself and you are not asking these questions to know The Truth but rather to see if you can get to the source of my Knowledge, you would be able to find or create a valid counter to me, and thereby make me fall

God Established Truth to be Immovable so, you are wasting your time and you will and must remain the-evil that you are.

So, I'll tell you, just to show others (for you know already being Satan's Avatar) that there is Absolutely No Way you can validly challenge Any and All of The Truths God Established since the beginning to last till the end of this world.

Proof of God was already settled for me (for I heard from Him) so I knew He was there but I did not know How to Prove He was to another.

And This where Law is King for Proof of Truth can ONLY BE REASONABLE AND BEYOND ALL REASONABLE DOUBT BE PROVEN BY LAW , ORDINARY NATURAL LIVING AND KNOWLEDGE OF LAW..

THERE IS NO OTHER WAY BESIDES THESE.

Thinkings and philosophy all stand or fall by Law.

And it takes approximately 10 years to become an expert in Law, so it is impossible for me to present my authentication outside a debate.

Now, it is only by debates you would see how a Truth is Established and how the Liar or the Untruthful can not validly rebut.

Neither could be prove his case when given the witness box.

Lies and Liars can never ever prove their cases before me and generally before Lawyers.

Only Truth Stands!

Bwahahahahahaha! See Artful Dodger. LMFAO!

LordReed:

It is the issue, if you knew the meaning you'd not be saying I reputated it. LoL!


Bwahahahahahaha! See Artful Dodger. LMFAO!

Because you have reached the reasonable end of the road with me and you do not have anything valid and reasonable to say.

Dtruthspeaker:


Because you have reached the reasonable end of the road with me and you do not have anything valid and reasonable to say.

You simply side stepped the issues so yeah there is no point in continuing with you.

LordReed:


You simply side stepped the issues so yeah there is no point in continuing with you.

You can not proceed with me since you do not know anything about the 770 Laws of Evidence, 697 rules of Civil Procedures and other laws which Validly Establish The Proof of Truth.

So No Road for you!