Recently, Yoruba's have argued that they are more united and civilized than the very rigid easterners "igbos" in particular by allowing other Yoruba's from other states rule Lagos.

Outside Lagos can the Yoruba's mention a single state In the west that has been governed by non-indigine since 1999?.

JUST MAKING SURE THAT THERE IS NO DOUBLE STANDARDS SOMEWHERE.

D1official:
Recently, Yoruba's have argued that they are more united and civilized than the very rigid easterners "igbos" in particular by allowing other Yoruba's from other states rule Lagos.

Outside Lagos can the Yoruba's mention a single state In the west that has been governed by non-indigine since 1999?.

JUST MAKING SURE THAT THERE IS NO DOUBLE STANDARDS SOMEWHERE.

Leave the accommodating landlords

I saw a post of an Igbo ruler in Ondo,once.
don't know if that's true tho.
Checked seems am right afterall.



OP here's a better question why is there no "no man's land in SE. "
Yet SE'sterners tried to make Sabon geri of Kano a no man's land?

D1official:
Recently, Yoruba's have argued that they are more united and civilized than the very rigid easterners "igbos" in particular by allowing other Yoruba's from other states rule Lagos.

Outside Lagos can the Yoruba's mention a single state In the west that has been governed by non-indigine since 1999?.

JUST MAKING SURE THAT THERE IS NO DOUBLE STANDARDS SOMEWHERE.

Firstly, due to the unaccommodating way of all tribes on Nigeria, it's improper for non indigenes to be holding titles or govt posts in a different state. The reason why you created this needless thread is noticed. It's dead on arrival. Go and do your