There are over 1,900 estimated election petitions from the 2023 elections, mostly the federal and state house of assembly despite the fact that both elections were transmitted realtime during election. Many winners have been sacked by the courts, sacking and counter sacking by PEPT and Appeal court. As the judiciary rightly ruled that IREV is only a viewing portal, hence it does not determine the winner or loser of an election. If transmitting realtime on IREV was the ultimate, then there would not have been this much number of litigation. Neither INEC or the IREV is the problem but the manipulations at the grassroots. An example is a certain Cynthia Okeke who manipulated votes for LP's presidential candidate and went under the radar, such a dubious manipulations would have been uploaded realtime on IREV thereby giving the public a false impression of victory. It is disingeneous from the oppositions in their attempt to deligitimize a free, fair and credible election just because IREV wasn't uploaded.

Until we stop the manipulations at the voting levels, uploading on IREV realtime will not solve a thing, the fact that manipulated and cooked results will be uploaded on IREV and eventually announced by INEC. The court will still continue to determine the winners of our elections based on the electoral laws until we sanitize the grassroots.

Those who tongue lashing INEC in their desperation to scapegoat the institution should try and be reasonable for once. Despite NASS elections being uploaded realtime, litigations are strangely overwhelming.

The court is the reason for the many litigations because they have made technicality the primary determination of their jurisprudence.

Most senators and representatives who went to court despite their irev not tempered with did so to compromised the already corrupt judges not to look at merit but technicality

Pakute:
There are over 1,900 estimated election petitions from the 2023 elections, mostly the federal and state house of asrembly despite the fact that both elections were transmitted realtime during election. Many winners have been sacked by the courts, sacking and counter sacking by PEPT and Appeal court. As the judiciary rightly ruled that IREV is only a viewing portal, hence it does not determine the winner or loser of an election. If transmitting realtime on IREV was the ultimate, then there would not have been this much number of litigation. Neither INEC or the IREV is the problem but the manipulations at the grassroots. An example is a certain Cynthia Okeke who manipulated votes for LP's presidential candidate and went under the radar, such a dubious manipulations would have been uploaded realtime on IREV thereby giving the public a false impression of victory. It is disingeneous from the oppositions in their attempt to deligitimize a free, fair and credible election just because IREV wasn't uploaded.

DMerciful:
The court is the reason for the many litigations because the have made technicality the primary determination of their jurisprudence.

Most senators and representatives who went to court despite their irev not tempered with did so to compromised the already corrupt judges not to look at merit but technicality

You are here exposing your ignorance, the subject in question is about IREV. Technicality itself is a component of jurispudence, you can't build something on nothing.

You asked a question but confined yourself to your own thoughts.

IREV was used yet litigations and you want me to say IREV does dont determine credibility of elections?

The truth is that people who lost based on realtime uploads on IREV know they lost but they also know they can win in court because the court is compromised!

Pakute:

You are here exposing your ignorance, the subject in question is about IREV. Technicality itself is a component of jurispudence, you can't build something on nothing.

DMerciful:
You asked a question but confined yourself to your own thoughts.

IREV was used yet litigations and you and me to say IREV does dont determine credibility of elections?

The truth is that people who lost based on realtime uploads on IREV know they lost but they also know they can win in court because the court is compromised!

Give us examples of where technicalities won over real majority votes in last election.

Plateau elections. Most of the winners of opposition that the court removed were based on technicalities. Many of LP candidates that were removed were based on pre-election matter that even the Supreme Court sustained for APC

Eniitankorede:




Give us examples of where technicalities won over real majority votes in last election.

DMerciful:
Plateau elections. Most of the winners of opposition that the court removed were based on technicalities. Many of LP candidates that were removed were based on pre-election matter that even the Supreme Court sustained for APC

No lp member won in plateau na.

Where did I say LP won in Plateau? I used opposition. The second statement is other states

garfield1:


No lp member won in plateau na.

DMerciful:
Where did I say LP won in Plateau? I used opposition. The second statement is other states

The appeal courts are the ones doing the technicality not the apex court

DMerciful:
You asked a question but confined yourself to your own thoughts.

IREV was used yet litigations and you want me to say IREV does dont determine credibility of elections?

The truth is that people who lost based on realtime uploads on IREV know they lost but they also know they can win in court because the court is compromised!

The court is compromised which is the usual anthem of losers but it's victory for democracy when they win. PDP Governor's forum has reviewed all the judgements of the SC and in their press release, passed a vote of confidence on the judiciary.

PDAPC are one and the same!

Was it not Tinubu that resolved Wike and Fubara debacle? Are they not in PDP?

All institutions in Nigeria are compromised!

IREV is a game changer if and only if INEC will use it without interference

Pakute:

The court is compromised which is the usual anthem of losers but it's victory for democracy when they win. PDP Governor's forum has reviewed all the judgements of the SC and in their press release, passed a vote of confidence on the judiciary.

The apex court affirms the appeal court so indirectly doing the technicality.

You guys think you're doing the opposition but no sane foreign investor will invest in a country with compromised judiciary because they wanna be sure of speedy litigations and above all justice if the need arises

garfield1:


The appeal courts are the ones doing the technicality not the apex court

DMerciful:
PDAPC are one and the same!

Was it not Tinubu that resolved Wike and Fubara debacle? Are they not in PDP?

All institutions in Nigeria are compromised!

IREV is a game changer if and only if INEC will use it without interference

And LPDP are what?, who were the Atikulators in 2019 and who are the break away faction of Obidient in 2023?
if IREV is the all in all, the litigations sweeping across NASS election would not have happened.

Economy hard and Lawyers need to make money

DMerciful:
The apex court affirms the appeal court so indirectly doing the technicality.

You guys think you're doing the opposition but no sane foreign investor will invest in a country with compromised judiciary because they wanna be sure of speedy litigations and above all justice if the need arises

You are a son of a liar, election loss has made you gone mad.

Pakute,

There's consequences for criminality.

The criminalities done during the elections will start yielding their consequences going forward.

Nigerians have got it coming!

Pakute:

You are a son of a liar, election loss has made you gone mad.

It would still happen especially as the Supreme Fraud has said IREV is optional.

If the Supreme Fraud had insisted that only IREV results will determine outcomes, there'll be less litigations next elections

Pakute:

And LPDP are what?, who were the Atikulators in 2019 and who are the break away faction of Obidient in 2023?
if IREV is the all in all, the litigations sweeping across NASS election would not have happened.

Another nuisance thread...

IREV shows the true picture.. you only need your rep to ascertain what was inputed in the IREV, alongside, it can be confirmed with Original uploaded copy...

What could be more original and straight forward than that?.. cancelled and mutilated copies with zero backup?.. the sack of winners then would basically be on pre-election matters etc, atleast not the election itself..

Well, this does not dispute the fact, this is a thread to cause nuisance, because the truth is obvious.

This one is trying so hard to turn logic on its head. State one court judgement that was based on strict compliance with the provisions of the Election Act 2022 and 1999 constitution and I'll state 10 cases that were determined on technicalities. The very thing that was meant to change the fortunes of our electoral system (IREV) has been dumped in the dustbin of history. Didn't it surprise you that INEC had to claim a 'glitch', but received no reprimand whatsoever?. Has Prof Yakubu been as vocal as he ought to be? He knows the commission didn’t bargain for what the PEPT and SC churned out as judgements. Public trust has been eroded and desperate politicians can now have their way. Why don't you wait to see how the elections in Kogi, Imo and Bayelsa would go, to be sure how backward we have travelled in our electoral jurisprudence. We're back to 1999. No sitting governor would prefer a collation system that makes recourse to technology. That chapter is closed for Nigeria.

Now, if technology couldn't help us, what will?

DMerciful:
It would still happen especially as the Supreme Fraud has said IREV is optional.

If the Supreme Fraud had insisted that only IREV results will determine outcomes, there'll be less litigations next elections

SC cannot insist on something that is not in the electoral law. The court is not a father christmas.

DMerciful:
Pakute,

There's consequences for criminality.

The criminalities done during the elections will start yielding their consequences going forward.

Nigerians have got it coming!

We've left you behind, keep on sulking.

DrMPH, the elections that were uploaded realtime on IREV, why were they dragging themselves to court and having it upturned?. you allowed shallow emotion becloud your reasoning

You said father Christmas because you think if the Supreme Fraud says IREV is compulsory(which it can do as a court of policy), it'd be doing the Obidients a favor.
You f00lishly think that credible elections is doing Obidients and not Nigerians a favor

Pakute:

SC cannot insist on something that is not in the electoral law. The court is not a father christmas.

Pakute:
DrMPH, the elections that were uploaded realtime on IREV, why were they dragging themselves to court and having it upturned?. you allow shallow emotion becloud your reasoning

I think someone already answered that question or you just want to be coy. Two or three of such judgments are even on today's NL front page. Pre-election matters or matters that border on qualification are not even the issue, it is what the courts have done to IREV. Since you, like the courts believe technology doesn't matter in our electoral system, just watch what would will happen in the off-season elections. After that you can judge if we've made any progress as a nation.

Pakute:
There are over 1,900 estimated election petitions from the 2023 elections, mostly the federal and state house of assembly despite the fact that both elections were transmitted realtime during election. Many winners have been sacked by the courts, sacking and counter sacking by PEPT and Appeal court. As the judiciary rightly ruled that IREV is only a viewing portal, hence it does not determine the winner or loser of an election. If transmitting realtime on IREV was the
ultimate, then there would not have been this much number of litigation. Neither INEC or the IREV is the problem but the manipulations at the grassroots. An example is a certain Cynthia Okeke who manipulated votes for LP's presidential candidate and went under the radar, such a dubious manipulations would have been uploaded realtime on IREV thereby giving the public a false impression of victory. It is disingeneous from the oppositions in their attempt to deligitimize a free, fair and credible election just because IREV wasn't uploaded.

Stop writing what you don't know

Peterobi90:
Another nuisance thread...

IREV shows the true picture.. you only need your rep to ascertain what was inputed in the IREV, alongside, it can be confirmed with Original uploaded copy...

What could be more original and straight forward than that?.. cancelled and mutilated copies with zero backup?.. the sack of winners then would basically be on pre-election matters etc, atleast not the election itself..

Well, this does not dispute the fact, this is a thread to cause nuisance, because the truth is obvious.

A cooked result can be uploaded straight to IREV realtime, that's why some results are being upturned. IREV is only a viewing portal.

DMerciful:
The apex court affirms the appeal court so indirectly doing the technicality.

You guys think you're doing the opposition but no sane foreign investor will invest in a country with compromised judiciary because they wanna be sure of speedy litigations and above all justice if the need arises

No sir.the apex court judges right.obi had no case and was rightly trashed.

DMerciful:
You said father Christmas because you think if the Supreme Fraud says IREV is compulsory(which it can do as a court of policy), it'd be doing the Obidients a favor.
You f00lishly think that credible elections is doing Obidients and not Nigerians a favor

The court cannot make what is not in the law compulsory, receive sense. Until the law is reviewed by the senate.

Tinubu forged his certificate he presented to INEC, he forfeited 460k for narcotics,
he commited perjury, he has dual citizenship, he did not get 25% Abuja, he rigged the election.

Why are you defending the Supreme Court that a retiring justice Dattijo called corrupt and compromised? Do you know more than a justice of the Supreme Court?

garfield1:


No sir.the apex court judges right.obi had no case and was rightly trashed.

DrMPH:


I think someone already answered that question or you just want to be coy. Two or three of such judgments are even on today's NL front page. Pre-election matters or matters that border on qualification are not even the issue, it is what the courts have done to IREV. Since you, like the courts believe technology doesn't matter in our electoral system, just watch what would will happen in the off-season elections. After that you can judge if we've made any progress as a nation.

And how about the results that have been upturned due to invalid votes and overvoting? Atleast the issue of pre election matters have been rightly restored by appeal courts.