Many postgraduate researchers believe AI tools like Bard (formerly Bard, now Gemini), CoPilot of Bing and ChatGPT hold the key to a distinction-worthy dissertation. While AI can be a valuable asset, it shouldn't replace your critical thinking nor your understanding of the research process.

Here's why relying solely on AI is risky:

1. Citation Catastrophe: AI might generate fabricated references that won't survive professorial verification. Imagine the embarrassment (and potential consequences) of getting caught!

2. The Unnatural Author: AI writing often has a distinct style, characterized by complex grammar and vocabulary that feels out of place in a student's work. This can raise red flags for professors.

3. Errors and Fallacies: AI-generated content can contain errors and assumptions that don't align with reality. Professors are familiar with the existing literature in your field and will likely spot these inconsistencies.

Dissertations require in-depth understanding and ownership of the research process. AI should be a tool to enhance your work, not a shortcut that bypasses critical analysis.

Drawing on my 11+ years as a research consultant, I've created the "Dissertation Hack" e-Book. This resource equips you with the strategies to develop a stellar dissertation while using AI responsibly.

By the way, can you tell if this article was written by human or AI?

Get a copy of the Dissertation Hack eBook today and thank me later, +2347068180074 (WhatsApp Only)

Wuna dey learn work,!!

AOresources:
Wuna dey learn work,!!

What is the meaning of this rubbish? If you have no business with a post, all you have to do is to go past it. You are also a writer, why not focus on your lane?