1stGenAmerican:


If you go back to the beginning of the other thread, he told you all that he confessed because he didn’t know better. Now he has changed the story completely and started out this reply saying he was never arrested yet ended it with him being placed under arrest.

This is getting funny because he is clowning you all. How does someone on a VISITORS VISA BUY SIX SUVs CASH and LIVE in an apartment complex? In the US, there is a procedure to making very large purchases with cash and anyone who knows that procedure will see the lie.
How does someone on a VISITORS VISA LAWFULLY BUY, REGISTER, AND INSURE A CAR?

You guys are dealing with a compulsive liar who will soon manipulate you into thinking that police were jealous of his wealth.

1stGenAmerican:


If you go back to the beginning of the other thread, he told you all that he confessed because he didn’t know better. Now he has changed the story completely and started out this reply saying he was never arrested yet ended it with him being placed under arrest.

This is getting funny because he is clowning you all. How does someone on a VISITORS VISA BUY SIX SUVs CASH and LIVE in an apartment complex? In the US, there is a procedure to making very large purchases with cash and anyone who knows that procedure will see the lie.
How does someone on a VISITORS VISA LAWFULLY BUY, REGISTER, AND INSURE A CAR?

You guys are dealing with a compulsive liar who will soon manipulate you into thinking that police were jealous of his wealth.

Bush2013:
when I read this from him I weak actually six suvs plus many other things in a space of 2month visiting visa?? Is he a car dealer? Well I no be witch wey the sabi beyond wetin ordinary eyes can see but with wetin I dey read I weak sha. May God in his own way deliver the OP if he is innocent of the crime.
Amen but till then I still weak

wirinet:


These are irrelevant to the charges. He was not charged for theft, robbery or fraud, he was charged and sentenced for rape and assault of a minor. So I don't see what buying six suvs plus many other things in a space of two month visiting visa has to do with it.

wirinet:


These are irrelevant to the charges. He was not charged for theft, robbery or fraud, he was charged and sentenced for rape and assault of a minor. So I don't see what buying six suvs plus many other things in a space of two month visiting visa has to do with it.

Investigators were able to find surveillance footage that showed Bah chase the victim into the woods, and two types of DNA evidence helped tie Bah to the crime, the release said. The victim also testified during the trial.

GetMeRight:


But he said he couldn't be at two places at the same time. Was he truly the one in surveillance camera? I have never seen a confusing case like this before!

Powerhouse5050:
I haven taken the pictures of the evidence that proved and identified my identity at the crime time....and also the copy of the 911 record manuscript.

I will be sending them to Chatinent and hopefully he will upload them here as soon as he received them.

In fact after being shown the footage, Mr. Bah signed an affidavit acknowledging that it is he who appears in the footage.

wirinet:


These are irrelevant to the charges. He was not charged for theft, robbery or fraud, he was charged and sentenced for rape and assault of a minor. So I don't see what buying six suvs plus many other things in a space of two month visiting visa has to do with it.

ClixMaster:
The JD guy or woman is the one bringing up all this irrelevances here. Face the charges against him and let them stop this witchcraft. I just pray God will help if he is innocent.

daintyprincess:

With what he has been saying, I can deduce that there are two footages, don't these footages have timestamps on them, at least to show when he passed and when the event happened cause he was about to give the time frame of the event in an earlier post.

Is it that they decided to override the timestamp on the footage even when they know the time the event took place, that's if the CCTV have timestamp?

GetMeRight:


But what about this information below?


All what you are saying is that the DNA didn't match yours. Did someone already raped the girl and you just happened to be the one chasing her after that for God knows what?

tellwisdom:


Are you technically saying no DNA report had ever been tampered before in the history of America and no judgement whatsoever overturned?. Educate me

I am not taking sides here whether he’s guilty or innocent. Just want to get some facts

ClixMaster:
He is just talking as if there is no single corruption in American judicial system. DNA can be tampered anywhere.

In fact after being shown the footage, Mr. Bah signed an affidavit acknowledging that it is he who appears in the footage.

deewhytee:


I wonder oo... he's sounding so vindictive, as if he knows the guy from somewhere before... abi he don drag girlfriend with him before ni?
Why he's all over the thread, vilifying the guy upandan is beyond me. (As if e dey dia when the guy was committing the crime).

He doesn't even want to leave room for the fact that the guy could have been wrongly accused and convicted (like it happens at times all over the world...US inclusive.)

Wetin happen gangan sef??
Yoruba people would say "OLORUN ma je kaa pade Alatako oo".. Amin
(Meaning: may GOD not allow us to be unfortunate to encounter an Antagonist oo.. Amen!

ivolt:

I understand the conviction for rape but the others should have been seriously challenged.
I was shocked when I saw "terroristic threats" as part of the charges against him.
They threw the book at him like the mafia lords of yesteryears.

chatinent:


Nice question.

Here were the sentences:

• Rape: life.
• Simple Battery: a year.
• Child molestation: 20 years.
• Terrorist threats: five years.
• Aggrav sexual battery
• False imprisonment: ten years.
• Aggrav sodomy.
• Aggrav assault.


More to that, here is my point: if he pleaded was guilty as postulated by a comment above, why did the judge say he was without remorse? At least, pleading guilty as claimed is one step to being remorseful which should lower the jail term.

I understand he might have said some things out of fear and all that, even when he wanted to be deported to serve a jail term here.

I do not support those crimes at all! I only want justice served to the right person.

Sth to reason on: the attorneys he consulted seem to be fighting on the inconclusive results, and unfair hearing thing.

I spoke with him. He strongly says he isn't the one. At least, he wouldn't lie to a lawyer...would he?

I also understand perfectly what 1stGenAmerican was saying. I think I really am waiting for the footage he will send which will be a ground for adjudication here when I post.

My only care is the harsh sentence.

1stGenAmerican:


The reason that the judge “threw the book at him” (which almost never happens) was for his blatant lack of remorse directly after the crime and during the trial, arrogance, and his victim-blaming.His attitude and demeanor during the trial was as if he was above the American Justice system and he treated it like a total joke and even the most violent American criminals don’t do that. Lastly, the court felt that since he had no remorse and blamed the victim, he would do this to another child if ever he was free again.

He was not sad or even remorseful until he the sentencing.

Powerhouse5050:

The were 4 cameras located at different locations in the complex

Camera 1 captured me : The clothing description by this lady and her family on 911 record showed the black male was wearing a Khaki short..... However I wasn't wearing khaki shorts.

There is another camera angle that captured the black male wearing khaki shorts, this video was viewed by a detective Adam Kiker and he wrote in his observatory report that he saw the black male that wears khaki short on camera.

That was the black male the lady reported,where is the video so that the world could see the face of the assailant.

This video was never released.......

Detective Adam Kiker also testified at the trial that he has seen the video and man in khaki short.

The video is an exculpatory evidence for me because I can never be at two different locations at the same time wearing two different types of cloth.

I have sent a copy of the 911 to Chatinent
I have sent a copy of the police officer report also
I also sent the police office trial testimony where he admitted to have seen the video of the man in khaki short.

The lady and her family all testified at the trial that the man was wearing khaki short.

Let us assume the victim was traumatized and made the mistake, how about the police officer that watched the surveillance video and confirmed he saw the man in khaki short was he traumatized also? And 3 years later,he came to the trial to testify under oath to this report.

Please wait for chatinent to upload these documents and you can see for yourself.

The police maliciously confused the general public by showing the wrong video,even though they are in possession of the real culprit video.

justwise:


I agree with you but though when you look at the definition you will sort of understand why that was included in the charge.

The sentencing is way too harsh and should be challenged but here is the prob though.. can the op plead for sentencing leniency while at the same time claiming innocent of the crime?

chatinent:



I also understand perfectly what 1stGenAmerican was saying. I think I really am waiting for the footage he will send which will be a ground for adjudication here when I post.

My only care is the harsh sentence.

justwise:


I guess that depends on the behaviour of the accused during the investigation and court hearing.

If you lied, frustrated the effort of the court and drag the victim through awful experiences only to plead guilty at the last minute then the judge will come down on you with heavy sentence.

Asking to be sent to Nigeria to serve the jail sentence is another way of saying that you are guilty of the crime.

ivolt:

It will be stupid to "tamper" with a DNA report that can easily be verified by many labs over and over again.
A suspect lawyer can simply request for a retest. It is that easy.
Note that it is not the police that carry out DNA tests.


Unless a suspect has an identical twin, DNA evidence is as strong as they come.
It is even better than having hundreds of eyewitness.

The OP may stand a chance of acquittal but that has nothing to do with his innocence or guilt but the
intelligence of his legal team if they believe him in the first place.

justwise:


Which footage are you referring to here? I hope its not footage of the rape? If its then i suggest you think carefully else you will land yourself in hot water. The victim in question here is 13 yrs of age so remember that

justwise:


I guess that depends on the behaviour of the accused during the investigation and court hearing.

If you lied, frustrated the effort of the court and drag the victim through awful experiences only to plead guilty at the last minute then the judge will come down on you with heavy sentence.

Asking to be sent to Nigeria to serve the jail sentence is another way of saying that you are guilty of the crime.

chatinent:


No, not that, that's against the law.

I mean the male figures.

Powerhouse5050:


I have sent it to your email, its slow because the files are big.

The easier and fastest way to send all these evidences is through phone text.....

wirinet:


That's why the case as presented by Powerhouse5050 is confusing. Didn't his lawyers present a defense? What about his alabi, was he anywhere close to the crime scene at the time of the crime? What's about his phone? Could the phone company he is using not present his ping records at the time of the rape to determine his location?

The only place to go now is the appeal court.

Why did he not appeal immediately the verdict and sentence was passed? Why wait 3 years before appealing?

Powerhouse5050:


About 1stGenAmerican : I dare him to produce the affidavit that he claimed I signed.
The police spread false information just like they said that my DNA was found on this lady but as you can see the truth from the documents I have shared.

2, My lawyer wanted to conduct in-court identification but the prosecuton objected to it and the judge ruled in favour of the prosecution.

Why was the lady not allowed to identify her attacker in court, it is a standard criminal practice in america but in my case it was ruled against?

3, No Sir
I arrived New York at end of April from Tokyo .....
I have only lived in the complex this crime happened for One month only, I saw this lady for the first time inside the court.

About the DNA we objected to it and now the issue is legally preserved for appellate court review.
My lawyer actually claimed the DNA was tampered with because it was unaccounted for, for 43days and the police officer evidence room supervisor testified they don't know about that because it was in possession of the detectives......they detective could not explain where it was and the GBI reported the seal on the evidence was not a proper seal.

I am in possession of all these facts and I will keep sharing them even though my response is slow, you all must understand that I am doing all this from inside prison.

1stGenAmerican:


If you go back to the beginning of the other thread, he told you all that he confessed because he didn’t know better. Now he has changed the story completely and started out this reply saying he was never arrested yet ended it with him being placed under arrest.

This is getting funny because he is clowning you all. How does someone on a VISITORS VISA BUY SIX SUVs CASH and LIVE in an apartment complex? In the US, there is a procedure to making very large purchases with cash and anyone who knows that procedure will see the lie.
How does someone on a VISITORS VISA LAWFULLY BUY, REGISTER, AND INSURE A CAR?