Ibrahimmufutau:
U people still living in fool paradise and continuing wailing a.k.a the waillers. President Tinubu is our President and he will not dissapoint his compatriots let's be patience everything shall be fixed for our goodness by special grace of God. Nigeria shall be great again.

Dr. Ngige was (and is still) one of the best governors Anambra State ever had.
But he ruled with a stolen mandate.
And that's what it is.

He did well. No doubts.
But he ruled with a stolen mandate.
No doubts too.

BluntCrazeMan:
Dr. Ngige was (and is still) one of the best governors Anambra State ever had.
But he ruled with a stolen mandate.
And that's what it is.

He did well. No doubts.
But he ruled with a stolen mandate.
No doubts too.

Yes,he was brought in by the godfathers and he fell out.tinubu stole no mandate,more people esp up north wanted him

Ibrahimmufutau:
U people still living in fool paradise and continuing wailing a.k.a the waillers. President Tinubu is our President and he will not dissapoint his compatriots let's be patience everything shall be fixed for our goodness by special grace of God. Nigeria shall be great again.

Nigeria will the great again cracked the hell out of me..🤣🤣
Like say Nigeria was ever great 😏🤨🙄 or will ever be great🥱🤨😒...
Keep wasting prayer...

Ethno-religiocentrism will forever be the bane of Nigeria..
Na why illiterate and incompetent Buhari ruled us for 8 years and why a drug pusher and sick Tinubu is ruling us now

Wetin una dey try explain
Shebi una say una no dey talk to the press
INEC is a fraudulent commission headed by a morally debase man🖕🖕🖕🖕
How can INEC raise objections to it own documents What is INEC afraid of
🖕🖕INEC

INEC should know that since the materials were given mainly for this election tribunal, in which ever area the LP or any other party uses it is not their business. They only need to defend it not to object to it



quote author=BluntCrazeMan post=123533066]

Source:
https://www.vanguardngr.com/2023/06/inec-explains-refusal-to-accept-admittance-of-documents-in-evidence/

**My Own Submissions On This Very Issue..**

Inside the LP’s PETITION,, I could clearly read where they specifically mentioned ELEVEN STATES, and then went ahead to write “AND OTHER STATES”


LP had produced the results in the mentioned 11 states,, and proceeded to continue to produce the results in some “OTHER” additional 7 States, making it a total of 18 States in all..

How can the INEC be expecting Peter Obi to tender only the STATE-LEVEL Collated Results for the States they were disputing, without him tendering all the Polling-unit Results, and all Wards Collated Results, and all the LGAs Collated Results of all the States he intended to dispute..??

How could the INEC be expecting them to present some LGAs inside any state which they are disputing, and then leave out some other LGAs,, yet they were supposed to be disputing the results in the whole of the mentioned states, and including “other states”?


For the Fact that he wrote “And Other States” inside his petition,, he is at liberty to dispute the whole if the 36 States and the FCT...
Thus, the 11 mentioned states are sacrosanct..
Any other states he added are at his choice.[/quote]

Racoon:
Is it INEC responsibility to determine the direction a petitioner's grievances should go? Why is INEC against its own documents? All these senseless rantings are just lame excuses, but that can't never stop the quest to unearth all the wuruwuru INEC legalised in the last presidential election.

They are crying over the ‘starter’. I wonder what their reaction would be when the ‘main course’ is served

senatordave1:


Yes,he was brought in by the godfathers and he fell out.tinubu stole no mandate,more people esp up north wanted him

Then, let Tinubu prove that he won fair-and-square, rather than finding technicalities to rely upon and dismiss the case..
Just the way they did in 2019.

Chindozy:


They are crying over the ‘starter’. I wonder what their reaction would be when the ‘main course’ is served

They will cry more.


Let me give you a history of their cries.

1. Peter Obi said that he would go to court, and they started crying that Peter wants to destabilize the country.

2. They later saw the petition and started crying, that Peter didn't pay attention to show how he won, and paid more attention to disqualifying Tinubu.

3. Peter wanted to inspect the BVAS, They started crying that he should go and get the results from his party agents.

4. Peter brought the paper evidence, they are still crying that he didn't state it in the petition that he would tender paper evidence

BluntCrazeMan:
Then, let him prove that he won fair-and-square, rather than finding technicalities to rely upon and dismiss the case..
Just the way they did in 2019.

No,it is in the place of lp to prove they won or there was rigging.he is not finding technicality,obi is the one giving room for such to happen.if he keeps bringing things not pleaded for,the case may be struck out for unfair hearing

BluntCrazeMan:
They will cry more.


Let me give you a history of their cries.

1. Peter Obi said that he would go to court, and they started crying that Peter wants to destabilize the country.

2. They later saw the petition and started crying, that Peter didn't pay attention to show how he won, and paid more attention to disqualifying Tinubu.

3. Peter wanted to inspect the BVAS, They started crying that he should go and get the results from his party agents.

4. Peter brought the paper evidence, they are still crying that he didn't state it in the petition that he would tender paper evidence

No one is crying.you are misunderstanding everything.you obidients always twists things in the media...
The earlier you guys stop the media nonsense,the better.you heard the judges condemn pdp for the media attack and you guys are still doing this media attack.read the handwriting

senatordave1:


No one is crying.you are misunderstanding everything.you obidients always twists things in the media...
The earlier you guys stop the media nonsense,the better.you heard the judges condemn pdp for the media attack and you guys are still doing this media attack.read the handwriting

No matter how you put it,, you guys are always the ones that will always find something to say at every move which Peter Obi makes.

BluntCrazeMan:
No matter how you put it,, you guys are always the ones that will always find something to say at every move which Peter Obi makes.

I hardly comment on such cases except you guys misconstrue issues

Why Tinubu, Mahmud & other allege riggers should be jailed for 2023 elections.

Since return of Democracy in 1999, Nigeria have never witness an election of at least 1993 standard, even though it wasn't totally credible. Yet, none is an glaring, open and totally dishonest as that of 2023....

It was the first time a lot happened.
* The first time A truly people oriented 3rd force came up with a tsunami as a revered King; Oni of Ife, called the labour party candidate, Peter Obi, widely believe to have won the election by a wide margin.

* The first time a known drug dealer and money laundering mule, known and convicted internationally was selected and announced as President.

* The first time a wide margin of Nigerians from different tribe agreed that the current usurper should leave, not because they hated him but because he's totally unfit, sick, corrupt, stole another person Mandate and none can tell for sure his real identify!

Why can't this old sick drug mule leave? certainly not by force to rule a people.

Why Buhari govt allowed this man to be sworn in is something a sane human would have difficulty wrapping up.

June 12 comes to mind. Though the military do not want Mr Abiola, they were not this brazen and this callous and shameless when it comes to total disregard for the Nigerians, her Constitution, as to affirm a dishonest, drug peddling corrupt perjurer as president. Even the military were afraid of the Nigerian people, how civilians do not is a matter for another day.

Prof Yakubu Mahmud deserve some jail term for these infractions, at least to serve as deterrent for future INEC officials.

Also, Tinubu deserve to spend at least one year in kuje, and five years in supervised sentence(due to old age & his health. Words on the street is that he's living on borrowed time), at least to show future leaders that if you rig and get caught, you will do the time.

Wealth wise, Tinubu is not richer than Trump who is currently facing charges at a Manhattan Court.

Prof Yakubu Mahmud INEC through INEC legal representative, rejecting its own CTC documents released by them should be the last stroke to break the camel's back....what a huge joke to confirm what we all knew: 2023 elections was sold to Mr Bola Ahmed Tinubu, as a recompense for 2015 support for Mr Buhari, and Also due to religious bigotry.

To address those who claim that Obi did not win in the north, it is important to remember that the election was not solely about individual candidates. During the presidential election in Nigeria, the citizens were exhausted with the ruling party, the APC (All Progressives Congress), and collectively desired a change. The focus was on moving away from the APC and having a neutral party take over. The narrative about tribal affiliations only surfaced after the APC realized the outcome of the presidential elections.
Take a look at this PU result from Sokoto...

In a neutral election and without the acrimony of 8 years of direction less governance by the ruling party, LP would not have stood any chance. people voted to get rid of APC, impunity and lies which Bola Ahmed Tinubu has now come to symbolize!

Yakubu de hushpuppy pro max.
Yakubu de corporate frudstar

You are JUST blabbing TRASH. INEC should bring their own EC8A evidence to the court to dispute what the petitioner has tended OR better still keep SHVT.

sreamsense:
Court does not deal with emotion, but the law. For obi to bring irrelevant materials as exhibit will just amount to waste of time. Is it not the same EC8A that one 'Amaka' would sign for all polling unit agents of other parties for fraud cases? How can that be reliable? The electronically transmitted ones remains more reliable. LP can't teach INEC on how to do her work. Same procedures were followed where LP won and other previous elections. At the end of the day, INEC and APC will give reasons for their objections and let's see if LP will not begin to cry foul again

Don't mind him, he's calling his party attack dogs at you. They all get offended when you pay them back with their own coin..

Dafresh:

So you don't know that Peter Obi is my good dad I returned the insult black you, you can't insult some one I love and I will be quiet it doesn't work that way

sreamsense:
Court does not deal with emotion, but the law. For obi to bring irrelevant materials as exhibit will just amount to waste of time. Is it not the same EC8A that one 'Amaka' would sign for all polling unit agents of other parties for fraud cases? How can that be reliable? The electronically transmitted ones remains more reliable. LP can't teach INEC on how to do her work. Same procedures were followed where LP won and other previous elections. At the end of the day, INEC and APC will give reasons for their objections and let's see if LP will not begin to cry foul again

This you comments do not matter now all documnets have accpeted by the court, so by next week you would be see the actual scores, calm down, what we all want is a better Nigeria, APC/PDP/LP as long as they do right by the masses it ok. if Tinubu won and the court decides so well and fine.

So INEC and APC should combine together since they are one team. Its a shame that INEC should be doing this, the whole of INEC needs a serious reorganisation.

senatordave1:



Oga,you must list out everything before the court.you might not tell them how you want to prove it but you must tell them what you are bringing and your complaints...

I just heard that nuhu ribadu is national security adviser.cc Fergie001,kyase

nasoi hear too oo

SaiOba:
Don't mind him, he's calling his party attack dogs at you. They all get offended when you pay them back with their own coin..

Thanks, the will be the first to abuse but when you return the abuse to them they will call mods

Kyase:
nasoi hear too oo

I don't think he is capable

sreamsense:
Court does not deal with emotion, but the law. For obi to bring irrelevant materials as exhibit will just amount to waste of time. Is it not the same EC8A that one 'Amaka' would sign for all polling unit agents of other parties for fraud cases? How can that be reliable? The electronically transmitted ones remains more reliable. LP can't teach INEC on how to do her work. Same procedures were followed where LP won and other previous elections. At the end of the day, INEC and APC will give reasons for their objections and let's see if LP will not begin to cry foul again

But the amaka you are talking about is an inec personnel, if an inec personnel is easily compromised to do illegality, who should be held responsible? Inec or obi and labour party, obi even went to court for the fact that inec is completely incompetent in handling their responsibility, just as you pointed out in the amaka issue, why then are you worried about it, when it comes to emotions, obi is doing his job representing his party, what's inec business in determining how many lga obi calls out from each state

senatordave1:


Inec is saying that the documents being pleaded now were never pleaded by lp

They have been admitted as evidence... Stop crying

senatordave1:



I don't think he is capable

why

senatordave1:



Not true.2019 polls was basically governed by 2010 electoral act.the only difference with 2022 act is electronic accreditation.obidients do not know anything about law and they don't want to accept

Oga you lack understanding o. I didn't say there was no electoral act or law during that time. There is a huge difference from the 2010 and the 2022 Act. If 2022 was in force then, Atiku would have won the case. Period!

meolaniyi:
Place holder president will soon be booted out

I thought he will never be sworn in.

Jeffy1206:
Oga you lack understanding o. I didn't say there was no electoral act or law during that time. There is a huge difference from the 2010 and the 2022 Act. If 2022 was in force then, Atiku would have won the case. Period!

Not true.the major difference is bvas.atiku never won so how could he prove his case

Kyase:
why

He was a policeman and in efcc.yiu need a rtd gen or Intel officer that will command influence within the security community

Danniedpastor:

They have been admitted as evidence... Stop crying

They were admitted as exhibits not evidence.until obi showcases irregularities in those results,they will be thrash

senatordave1:


He was a policeman and in efcc.yiu need a rtd gen or Intel officer that will command influence within the security community

it doesn't work that way, just because successive government appointment someone with military background doesn't make it a law or a must

senatordave1:


Not true.the major difference is bvas.atiku never won so how could he prove his case

that's what you would say na. There were over voting in so many places that Buhari won. He couldn't prove that cos there was no bvas then...

Jeffy1206:
that's what you would say na. There were over voting in so many places that Buhari won. He couldn't prove that cos there was no bvas then...

There was overvoting in places where atiku won in the south.it balanced itself

Kyase:
it doesn't work that way, just because successive government appointment someone with military background doesn't make it a law or a must

True.with his track record,he will do well.but NSA and minister of defense will go core north