senatordave1:



Not true sir.in law,you must be clear, unambiguous and specific.you must always give the other parties notice of what you want to do I order to avoid ambush and unfair hearing

You talk about ambiguity but you dispute the 25% FCT Issue that a president must have. Is that not double standard?

InvertedHammer:
/
INEC messed up big time.

They are hoping on legal technicalities and bribery.
That's why INEC and her Siamese twin APC were shouting "Go to court!"

/

Obi team actually messed up by not informing inec thereby giving room for technicality

sreamsense:
Court does not deal with emotion, but the law. For obi to bring irrelevant materials as exhibit will just amount to waste of time. Is it not the same EC8A that one 'Amaka' would sign for all polling unit agents of other parties for fraud cases? How can that be reliable? The electronically transmitted ones remains more reliable. LP can't teach INEC on how to do her work. Same procedures were followed where LP won and other previous elections. At the end of the day, INEC and APC will give reasons for their objections and let's see if LP will not begin to cry foul again

why e dey pain you na ?

sportskid:


You talk about ambiguity but you dispute the 25% FCT Issue that a president must have. Is that not double standard?

ignore that thing you're arguing with

sportskid:


You talk about ambiguity but you dispute the 25% FCT Issue that a president must have. Is that not double standard?

How does that correlate? We are talking about the mistakes obi team made and you are talking of fct.that fct issue won't fly,you should know where the judges will lean

Inec will soon confess and mamood is going to jail.Tinubu has already made it clear that he don't have enough time,he just want to recover his campaign money thats why he removed subsidy on his first speech

oyebanji44:


Wetin obi wan go find from the areas where the election was disputed.?

inshort , dat obi na mumu....

Baba e sure me say you no understand what is posted here…Chai how mugu take get data.

sreamsense:
Court does not deal with emotion, but the law. For obi to bring irrelevant materials as exhibit will just amount to waste of time. Is it not the same EC8A that one 'Amaka' would sign for all polling unit agents of other parties for fraud cases? How can that be reliable? The electronically transmitted ones remains more reliable. LP can't teach INEC on how to do her work. Same procedures were followed where LP won and other previous elections. At the end of the day, INEC and APC will give reasons for their objections and let's see if LP will not begin to cry foul again

do u know what "certified true copy" means?

LP petition will be thrown into the dustbin on TECHNICALITIES. It’s becoming clearer everyday.

BAT is HERE for 8 years

Bobloco:
Pinhero explained that issues were not joined in the local government areas where the result sheets were sought to be tendered, adding that it was wrong for the petitioners to go beyond the areas where the election was disputed.

According to INEC, the local government areas unlawfully smuggled into proceedings of the court are totally strange to the petition and cannot stand in the face of the law.

So, what they wanted was for the petitioner to inform them before hand so that they can go and do their magomago

Come to think of it, is INEC not proud of the results they declared at the state level and federal level

INEC should just accept that they were caught off guard and will be exposed

You think law is your Okrika market?

Racoon:
Is it INEC responsibility to determine the direction a petitioner's grievances should go? Why is INEC against its own documents? All these senseless rantings are just lame excuses, but that can't never stop the quest to unearth all the wuruwuru INEC legalised in the last presidential election.

omo. The thing tire me

Joevics:
Election held in every local government area, and it's the right of the petitioner to decide on the scope of their petition.

INEC should rest. They've done enough.

What are you saying? He (INEC is a person now) should work till the end (jail). He was paid in full!

Do you know how much?

Common mate

femisplash:
@ senatordave1, you are very correct, Obi was busy tendering documents that was outside his petition. Obi is really clowning.

that Inec San is nothing but a daft,when you read obi petition you will find out that he has the right to bring evidence in all the states,he mentioned eleven state and other states,try to understand common English,on the long run that and 25% in Fct is where am waiting for Inec San interpretation of the word 'and' its clear that Inec is not independent at all.

Flangelo12:


You think law is your Okrika market?

What is law

oyebanji44:


Wetin obi wan go find from the areas where the election was disputed.?

inshort , dat obi na mumu....

Obi is not a man to be toiled with, Lamidi Apapa story is closed and you think his court evidences is a joke to you ….Judiciary will shock you people
On God

sreamsense:
Court does not deal with emotion, but the law. For obi to bring irrelevant materials as exhibit will just amount to waste of time. Is it not the same EC8A that one 'Amaka' would sign for all polling unit agents of other parties for fraud cases? How can that be reliable? The electronically transmitted ones remains more reliable. LP can't teach INEC on how to do her work. Same procedures were followed where LP won and other previous elections. At the end of the day, INEC and APC will give reasons for their objections and let's see if LP will not begin to cry foul again

Where did INEC get the electronically transferred ones? Were different ones transferred from their local offices other than the ones retained at those offices, which the petitioner has obtained and presented?

senatordave1:


He will inform the court and respondents before hand

But court had already admitted the documents moreover the said documents are certified true copies from INEC so why should same INEC reject their own document as evidence citing that it came from local government levels hence can not be tendered as evidence? So how did they arrive to the results they collated in Abuja which led to their declaration of a winner is it no longer results presented from local government areas then to state before the Abuja collation?

When you want to determine the cause of a problem you must start from the root. You don't just start from the effect. The simple thing here is that INEC has been caught off guard and about to be exposed.

All I know for sure is that this case is going to be a long ride for LP but surely the truth will be revealed cos INEC can not reject its own very document as illegal else they will have to prove it.

Una see this money weh Yakubu chop take impose a leader on us all e go hook am shebi the other man called Apapa don rest now he doesn't come to court again to drag leadership of LP and to request that all LP case in tribunal be withdrawn.

We are watching!

INEC should be dissolved.!!!!. Real new independent electoral body must be emerged.
INEC IS OPENLY WITH APC.!!!. and has to be stopped.

BluntCrazeMan:


Source:
https://www.vanguardngr.com/2023/06/inec-explains-refusal-to-accept-admittance-of-documents-in-evidence/

**My Own Submissions On This Very Issue..**

Inside the LP’s PETITION,, I could clearly read where they specifically mentioned ELEVEN STATES, and then went ahead to write “AND OTHER STATES”


LP had produced the results in the mentioned 11 states,, and proceeded to continue to produce the results in some “OTHER” additional 7 States, making it a total of 18 States in all..

How can the INEC be expecting Peter Obi to tender only the STATE-LEVEL Collated Results for the States they were disputing, without him tendering all the Polling-unit Results, and all Wards Collated Results, and all the LGAs Collated Results of all the States he intended to dispute..??

How could the INEC be expecting them to present some LGAs inside any state which they are disputing, and then leave out some other LGAs,, yet they were supposed to be disputing the results in the whole of the mentioned states, and including “other states”?


For the Fact that he wrote “And Other States” inside his petition,, he is at liberty to dispute the whole if the 36 States and the FCT...
Thus, the 11 mentioned states are sacrosanct..
Any other states he added are at his choice.

One refusing evidence that showed that one is a thief.
After the 2019 SERVER IMBROGLIO where this Mahmood took judges for a ride; he should have been sacked. But Buhari kept him for 2023 to do the worse.
The answer to the INEC Chairman's behaviour is the religious bigotry in him and the man who appointed him as elections umpire.
This man made a vow in November 2022 that no other method outside use of electronic transmission of vote results would be used for the general elections.
Nigerians got elated. Voted. After they voted; this man bent down and ate his vomit by using another method to steal victory for the party of his brotherhood in bigotry who appointed him INEC Chairman.
Yakubu Mahmood is acting God - refusing evidence that showed he stole presidential election.

BluntCrazeMan:


Source:
https://www.vanguardngr.com/2023/06/inec-explains-refusal-to-accept-admittance-of-documents-in-evidence/

**My Own Submissions On This Very Issue..**

Inside the LP’s PETITION,, I could clearly read where they specifically mentioned ELEVEN STATES, and then went ahead to write “AND OTHER STATES”


LP had produced the results in the mentioned 11 states,, and proceeded to continue to produce the results in some “OTHER” additional 7 States, making it a total of 18 States in all..

How can the INEC be expecting Peter Obi to tender only the STATE-LEVEL Collated Results for the States they were disputing, without him tendering all the Polling-unit Results, and all Wards Collated Results, and all the LGAs Collated Results of all the States he intended to dispute..??

How could the INEC be expecting them to present some LGAs inside any state which they are disputing, and then leave out some other LGAs,, yet they were supposed to be disputing the results in the whole of the mentioned states, and including “other states”?


For the Fact that he wrote “And Other States” inside his petition,, he is at liberty to dispute the whole if the 36 States and the FCT...
Thus, the 11 mentioned states are sacrosanct..
Any other states he added are at his choice.

Thank you my brother. That shows you are a very good and diligent researcher who pays kin attention to details. Keep it up. Now, to lend credence to what you said, in paragraph 101 (b) of the Petition, Peter Obi and L.P. specifically stated thus:
"101. At the trial, the Petitioners shall rely on all the 1st Respondent's electoral and other necessary documents used for the conduct of the Presidential election, including:
(b) All INEC Result sheets - Form EC8 Series EC8A, EC8B, EC8C, EC8D and EC8E in both physical and electronic copies."
I quoted that paragraph verbatim. This particular paragraph covers it all. So, you made a lot of valid points and I totally agree with you.

BluntCrazeMan:
Inside the LP’s PETITION,, I could clearly read where they specifically mentioned ELEVEN STATES, and then went ahead to write “AND OTHER STATES”

I want to believe you know why I bolded that 'and'.

You yourself are a first hand witness of how the meaning of 'and' was twisted out of meaning in the interpretation of 25%.

senatordave1:



Not true sir.in law,you must be clear, unambiguous and specific.you must always give the other parties notice of what you want to do I order to avoid ambush and unfair hearing

barrister to my little knowledge 'and', is not ambiguous word is as clear as portharcourt express road,no holdup.

Flangelo12:


You think law is your Okrika market?

No it's your Agbo hawking business.

Jokers😂😂😂😂😂


They look and act court-rusty

BluntCrazeMan:


Source:
https://www.vanguardngr.com/2023/06/inec-explains-refusal-to-accept-admittance-of-documents-in-evidence/

**My Own Submissions On This Very Issue..**

Inside the LP’s PETITION,, I could clearly read where they specifically mentioned ELEVEN STATES, and then went ahead to write “AND OTHER STATES”


LP had produced the results in the mentioned 11 states,, and proceeded to continue to produce the results in some “OTHER” additional 7 States, making it a total of 18 States in all..

How can the INEC be expecting Peter Obi to tender only the STATE-LEVEL Collated Results for the States they were disputing, without him tendering all the Polling-unit Results, and all Wards Collated Results, and all the LGAs Collated Results of all the States he intended to dispute..??

How could the INEC be expecting them to present some LGAs inside any state which they are disputing, and then leave out some other LGAs,, yet they were supposed to be disputing the results in the whole of the mentioned states, and including “other states”?


For the Fact that he wrote “And Other States” inside his petition,, he is at liberty to dispute the whole if the 36 States and the FCT...
Thus, the 11 mentioned states are sacrosanct..
Any other states he added are at his choice.

Inec didn’t see obedients coming , let me tell you the truth is that obedients that are out for a better Nigeria are more intelligent, smarter and connected
They knew that Inec will rig and they documented evidences and more will still come that will shock Inec
They don’t give a Bleep about anyone coz they know that whosoever that is against them does not want the good of our dear country
For how long will Nigeria keep selecting instead of electing their leaders making the electorate irelevant in their own Country
Democracy remains Government of the people by the people and for the people
Nigerian must be better
On God

INEC is the most useless & fraudelent Commission in the history of mankind & headed by very morally debase characters

senatordave1:


Obi team actually messed up by not informing inec thereby giving room for technicality

You should not waste your time educating this people.
From the response of one of the judges you will know that LP/Obi are just playing.
The judge’s response was like let them do what they want with their time.

senatordave1:


Lp listed 11 states.now they are bringing 18 states.lp are not even denying

Can you bring the section in the petition where just 11 states was listed please?

Let's be sure you're not basing your submission on hearsay.

BluntCrazeMan:


Source:
https://www.vanguardngr.com/2023/06/inec-explains-refusal-to-accept-admittance-of-documents-in-evidence/

**My Own Submissions On This Very Issue..**

Inside the LP’s PETITION,, I could clearly read where they specifically mentioned ELEVEN STATES, and then went ahead to write “AND OTHER STATES”


LP had produced the results in the mentioned 11 states,, and proceeded to continue to produce the results in some “OTHER” additional 7 States, making it a total of 18 States in all..

How can the INEC be expecting Peter Obi to tender only the STATE-LEVEL Collated Results for the States they were disputing, without him tendering all the Polling-unit Results, and all Wards Collated Results, and all the LGAs Collated Results of all the States he intended to dispute..??

How could the INEC be expecting them to present some LGAs inside any state which they are disputing, and then leave out some other LGAs,, yet they were supposed to be disputing the results in the whole of the mentioned states, and including “other states”?


For the Fact that he wrote “And Other States” inside his petition,, he is at liberty to dispute the whole if the 36 States and the FCT...
Thus, the 11 mentioned states are sacrosanct..
Any other states he added are at his choice.

Tinubu is scared 😨😳

oyebanji44:


Wetin obi wan go find from the areas where the election was disputed.?

inshort , dat obi na mumu....

Na your mumu pass o!

We were pl hit them hard when the least expect.
Our prayer has been that God should use the judiciary to change things for the good in this country.