Ovieemmanuel:
as joined together them no reach.

Sir I joined them together oh

meolaniyi:
Place holder president will soon be booted out

Tinubu will do.8 years . All.these will.be like movies for una ete. Just wait

BluntCrazeMan:


Source:
https://www.vanguardngr.com/2023/06/inec-explains-refusal-to-accept-admittance-of-documents-in-evidence/

**My Own Submissions On This Very Issue..**

Inside the LP’s PETITION,, I could clearly read where they specifically mentioned ELEVEN STATES, and then went ahead to write “AND OTHER STATES”


LP had produced the results in the mentioned 11 states,, and proceeded to continue to produce the results in some “OTHER” additional 7 States, making it a total of 18 States in all..

How can the INEC be expecting Peter Obi to tender only the STATE-LEVEL Collated Results for the States they were disputing, without him tendering all the Polling-unit Results, and all Wards Collated Results, and all the LGAs Collated Results of all the States he intended to dispute..??

How could the INEC be expecting them to present some LGAs inside any state which they are disputing, and then leave out some other LGAs,, yet they were supposed to be disputing the results in the whole of the mentioned states, and including “other states”?


For the Fact that he wrote “And Other States” inside his petition,, he is at liberty to dispute the whole if the 36 States and the FCT...
Thus, the 11 mentioned states are sacrosanct..
Any other states he added are at his choice.

Are you a qualified lawyer? If you're not a lawyer, then you're just writing jargons.

oyebanji44:


Wetin obi wan go find from the areas where the election was disputed.?

inshort , dat obi na mumu....

Calm down.

You folks told him to go to court, he is in court now.

The blues is still on, when it ends then ranting can start.

sreamsense:
Court does not deal with emotion, but the law. For obi to bring irrelevant materials as exhibit will just amount to waste of time. Is it not the same EC8A that one 'Amaka' would sign for all polling unit agents of other parties for fraud cases? How can that be reliable? The electronically transmitted ones remains more reliable. LP can't teach INEC on how to do her work. Same procedures were followed where LP won and other previous elections. At the end of the day, INEC and APC will give reasons for their objections and let's see if LP will not begin to cry foul again

Why are you crying more than the berieved?

Know this and have peace.

Obi is an Igbo man. Igbo man cannot rule Nigeria for now. That's the unwritten rule. Stop fooling yourselves like kindergarten pupils.

Assuming Obi's petition is successful, how will the Tribunal declare him winner ahead of Atiku? He didn't even include Atiku in his petition.

oyebanji44:


Wetin obi wan go find from the areas where the election was disputed.?

inshort , dat obi na mumu....

Big Mumu, Mumu Wey don build successful businesses, chairman 3 banks, chairman SEC, sit across boardrooms home and abroad, governor a state, corporate world guru, astute economist.

A very big Mumu, modest Mumu Wey no allow family enter politics, no use power put any family, wonderful Mumu Wey get 6.2 m votes in less than 8 months of campaigning in a new party, God abeg ooh, better Mumu.

sonature1:
Mr Kemi Pinhero, SAN! Who made this man a SAN?

Elections take place across polling units which are way smaller than LGAs.

If the result INEC declared doesn't tally with the results across the polling units, LGAs and states, it means INEC rigged the election in-house. That's enough to declare the petitioner the winner.

Not SAN but StAiN on the legal profession.

femisplash:

He has wasted 1wk out of 3wks. Obi is a boy.

You should be happy that he is wasting his time , relax the blues is on when it stops then you can continue.

tegrianonigltd:


Big Mumu, Mumu Wey don build successful businesses, chairman 3 banks, chairman SEC, sit across boardrooms home and abroad, governor a state, corporate world guru, astute economist.

A very big Mumu, modest Mumu Wey no allow family enter politics, no use power put any family, wonderful Mumu Wey get 6.2 m votes in less than 8 months of campaigning in a new party, God abeg ooh, better Mumu.

But he put Anambra money inside his family business and also put their money in offshore accounts. E mumu because he believed he could use ethnoreligious politics to win Nigerian presidential election like he did in Anambra State.

femisplash:
@ senatordave1, you are very correct, Obi was busy tendering documents that was outside his petition. Obi is really clowning.

Elections were not conducted only at the state capitals.
Elections were conducted beginning from the polling units to the wards to the LGAS, before results were tabulated state by state.
It's from the polling units to the wards and to the LGAs that election malpractices start to be traced.

This INEC has amply demonstrated that it's part of the ruling APC.

onuman:


Elections were not conducted only at the state capitals.
Elections were conducted beginning from the polling units to the wards to the LGAS, before results were tabulated state by state.
It's from the polling units to the wards and to the LGAs that election malpractices start to be traced.

This INEC has amply demonstrated that it's part of the ruling APC.

Stop smoking weed. You neva hear.

Obi is disputing the results in Adamawa and Osun.

If the election is conducted 200 times, Obi Kekerenke won't secure 80,000 votes in Osun State.

DesChyko:


I want to believe you know why I bolded that 'and'.

You yourself are a first hand witness of how the meaning of 'and' was twisted out of meaning in the interpretation of 25%.

The AND means that the Eleven states are on one side..

And then,, the Other States One the other side.

(In this case,, the 11 is sacrosanct....
But in the 25% case,, the FCT is sacrosanct)

High Neck is synonymous with FRAUD and DECEPTIONS

OGHENAOGIE:
by the time Court judge the issue finally they would curse court judges and call Nigeria zoo... How can LP accept results in Igboland but now dispute d one in Lagos Oyo ekiti Dem isn't same INEC that conducted the elections...

If you don't like the states they are disputing go to court.

MyExpression:


It's legally right, but not ethical to dismiss it.
It will be admitted as exhibit, but the court will give time for opposition to study the evidence.
Obi will have to explain to court, if the figures can significantly overturn the total outcome.
Can 7 LGAs do that?

Which 7 local govts? So, you suddenly left the 18 states in contention and chose to zero your mind on 7 LGAs? Na waa for una. A country & people in search of a missing truth while holding unto lies is irredeemable.

sreamsense:
Court does not deal with emotion, but the law. For obi to bring irrelevant materials as exhibit will just amount to waste of time. Is it not the same EC8A that one 'Amaka' would sign for all polling unit agents of other parties for fraud cases? How can that be reliable? The electronically transmitted ones remains more reliable. LP can't teach INEC on how to do her work. Same procedures were followed where LP won and other previous elections. At the end of the day, INEC and APC will give reasons for their objections and let's see if LP will not begin to cry foul again

Mumu... E go clear for una eyes.. INEC did know PO is this smart. He told them that he will prove it. Common sense is not common for the drug dealer...

senatordave1:



Not true sir.in law,you must be clear, unambiguous and specific.you must always give the other parties notice of what you want to do I order to avoid ambush and unfair hearing

Apt! This is the law.

Opeyemic01:
INEC is being mischievous here, the petition states that 11states and others. Their outburst would be valid if the petition states 11 states only.

You are correct my guy, they should calm down.

sangresan:


Are you a qualified lawyer? If you're not a lawyer, then you're just writing jargons.

Oga Sangresan..
If I am a lawyer, you cannot tell.
If I am not lawyer, you still cannot tell either..

Meanwhile, I am telling you that I read Peter Obi’s Petition, and I am now asking which of the Petition is the Counsel referring to.

Lawyer or no lawyer, anyone can read the petition.


As for you Mr. Sangresan,,, read this response below and learn further.

NICENEDU29:
Thank you my brother. That shows you are a very good and diligent researcher who pays kin attention to details. Keep it up. Now, to lend credence to what you said, in paragraph 101 (b) of the Petition, Peter Obi and L.P. specifically stated thus:
"101. At the trial, the Petitioners shall rely on all the 1st Respondent's electoral and other necessary documents used for the conduct of the Presidential election, including:
(b) All INEC Result sheets - Form EC8 Series EC8A, EC8B, EC8C, EC8D and EC8E in both physical and electronic copies."
I quoted that paragraph verbatim. This particular paragraph covers it all. So, you made a lot of valid points and I totally agree with you.

OGHENAOGIE:
by the time Court judge the issue finally they would curse court judges and call Nigeria zoo... How can LP accept results in Igboland but now dispute d one in Lagos Oyo ekiti Dem isn't same INEC that conducted the elections...

Is PO only trying to govern only Igbo land? You people have already started crying while case has not started. What PO presented was INEC material so why are they rejecting their own document... Cry cry people

sangresan:
Know this and have peace.

Obi is an Igbo man. Igbo man cannot rule Nigeria for now. That's the unwritten rule. Stop fooling yourselves like kindergarten pupils.

Assuming Obi's petition is successful, how will the Tribunal declare him winner ahead of Atiku? He didn't even include Atiku in his petition.

Hahahahaha... Stop crying

senatordave1:


Before bringing the remaining 11 states,they must inform respondents beforehand and properly serve them notice

According to the Pre-Hearing Report,, Any documents that were produced by the INEC themselves doesn't need to be given notice to the same INEC again before tendering, since the same INEC who produced such documents already knew what was inside the documents they produced and gave to the petitioners..

And INEC, and APC, and BAT/SHETTIMA all agreed to this before the proper hearing began.

senatordave1:



My brother, biasness doesn't fit you.what exactly is your isuue? What is fake about his explanation? Obidients get serious issues

Thanks for knowing that I have a bias..

Whether it fits me or not, should be a discussion for another day.

ukahrawah:


Which 7 local govts? So, you suddenly left the 18 states in contention and chose to zero your mind on 7 LGAs? Na waa for una. A country & people in search of a missing truth while holding unto lies is irredeemable.

They already declared the first 18...and INEC must have covered their assx...and are confident in court.

That's why they are rejecting this new documents, coz there's a legal lacuna to avoid blindsided and hasty judgement without a fair trial.

senatordave1:


You didn't read the post.inec is not objecting because of its genuineness but the wrong way of presentation

Wrong way of presentation?
Was it not INEC that realeased those true copies to LP?
Point of correction. INEC is not even talking about they way the evidences were presented. They are saumying that LP should not have presented true copies from LG levels and also documents outside the seven states they mentioned in the petition.... You sef know say INEC don dey fear

senatordave1:



Not true sir.in law,you must be clear, unambiguous and specific.you must always give the other parties notice of what you want to do I order to avoid ambush and unfair hearing

Bro..
Go to paragraph 101 where they wrote down all the documents which they would plead during the trial..
Go to paragraph 101(b) and tell me what you saw there.

In fact, read this response here.

NICENEDU29:
Thank you my brother. That shows you are a very good and diligent researcher who pays kin attention to details. Keep it up. Now, to lend credence to what you said, in paragraph 101 (b) of the Petition, Peter Obi and L.P. specifically stated thus:
"101. At the trial, the Petitioners shall rely on all the 1st Respondent's electoral and other necessary documents used for the conduct of the Presidential election, including:
(b) All INEC Result sheets - Form EC8 Series EC8A, EC8B, EC8C, EC8D and EC8E in both physical and electronic copies."
I quoted that paragraph verbatim. This particular paragraph covers it all. So, you made a lot of valid points and I totally agree with you.

sangresan:


But he put Anambra money inside his family business and also put their money in offshore accounts. E mumu because he believed he could use ethnoreligious politics to win Nigerian presidential election like he did in Anambra State.

Prove that to court

senatordave1:


He will inform the court and respondents before hand

He will inform the court that elections were held in all LGA in Nigeria? Una mumu never do?

sreamsense:
Court does not deal with emotion, but the law. For obi to bring irrelevant materials as exhibit will just amount to waste of time. Is it not the same EC8A that one 'Amaka' would sign for all polling unit agents of other parties for fraud cases? How can that be reliable? The electronically transmitted ones remains more reliable. LP can't teach INEC on how to do her work. Same procedures were followed where LP won and other previous elections. At the end of the day, INEC and APC will give reasons for their objections and let's see if LP will not begin to cry foul again

definitely you no get sense according to your moniker. Which result did eye-nec declare when Dino melaye was requesting for an electronic tally to those paperbased results Inec called and vehemently stated that electronic transmission was not a must ?

Ode ni yen Brother !!!

BluntCrazeMan:


Source:
https://www.vanguardngr.com/2023/06/inec-explains-refusal-to-accept-admittance-of-documents-in-evidence/

**My Own Submissions On This Very Issue..**

Inside the LP’s PETITION,, I could clearly read where they specifically mentioned ELEVEN STATES, and then went ahead to write “AND OTHER STATES”


LP had produced the results in the mentioned 11 states,, and proceeded to continue to produce the results in some “OTHER” additional 7 States, making it a total of 18 States in all..

How can the INEC be expecting Peter Obi to tender only the STATE-LEVEL Collated Results for the States they were disputing, without him tendering all the Polling-unit Results, and all Wards Collated Results, and all the LGAs Collated Results of all the States he intended to dispute..??

How could the INEC be expecting them to present some LGAs inside any state which they are disputing, and then leave out some other LGAs,, yet they were supposed to be disputing the results in the whole of the mentioned states, and including “other states”?


For the Fact that he wrote “And Other States” inside his petition,, he is at liberty to dispute the whole if the 36 States and the FCT...
Thus, the 11 mentioned states are sacrosanct..
Any other states he added are at his choice.

Wrong position. What’s the difference between 11 states and “other states”? Tell us the difference. Is it meant to confuse the judges as regards the remit of their dispute?