BluntCrazeMan:


Source:
https://www.vanguardngr.com/2023/06/inec-explains-refusal-to-accept-admittance-of-documents-in-evidence/

**My Own Submissions On This Very Issue..**

Inside the LP’s PETITION,, I could clearly read where they specifically mentioned ELEVEN STATES, and then went ahead to write “AND OTHER STATES”


LP had produced the results in the mentioned 11 states,, and proceeded to continue to produce the results in some “OTHER” additional 7 States, making it a total of 18 States in all..

How can the INEC be expecting Peter Obi to tender only the STATE-LEVEL Collated Results for the States they were disputing, without him tendering all the Polling-unit Results, and all Wards Collated Results, and all the LGAs Collated Results of all the States he intended to dispute..??

How could the INEC be expecting them to present some LGAs and then leave out some others,, yet they were disputing the results in the whole of the mentioned states “and other states”?


For the Fact that he wrote “And Other States” inside his petition,, he is at liberty to dispute the whole if the 36 States and the FCT...
Thus, the 11 mentioned states are sacrosanct..
Any other states he added are at his choice.

Not true sir.in law,you must be clear, unambiguous and specific.you must always give the other parties notice of what you want to do I order to avoid ambush and unfair hearing

BluntCrazeMan:
..








Them never see something yet..
We are still watching them, and following all of them Bumper-to-Bumper..[/b]


..

My brother, biasness doesn't fit you.what exactly is your isuue? What is fake about his explanation? Obidients get serious issues

Joevics:
Election held in every local government area, and it's the right of the petitioner to decide on the scope of their petition.

He will inform the court and respondents before hand

Bobloco:
Pinhero explained that issues were not joined in the local government areas where the result sheets were sought to be tendered, adding that it was wrong for the petitioners to go beyond the areas where the election was disputed.

According to INEC, the local government areas unlawfully smuggled into proceedings of the court are totally strange to the petition and cannot stand in the face of the law.

So, what they wanted was for the petitioner to inform them before hand so that they can go and do their magomago

Come to think of it, is INEC not proud of the results they declared at the state level and federal level

INEC should just accept that they were caught off guard and will be exposed

Oga,you must always inform everyone beforehand in court what you want to do

HIGHESTPOPORI:
Inec dey play.

Obi dey play

sonature1:
Mr Kemi Pinhero, SAN! Who made this man a SAN?

Elections take place across polling units which are way smaller than LGAs.

If the result INEC declared doesn't tally with the results across the polling units, LGAs and states, it means INEC rigged the election in-house. That's enough to declare the petitioner the winner.

Not true.the petitioner must not just prove that it isn't tallying but must show that he won

BluntCrazeMan:
Inside the PETITION,, I could clearly read where they mentioned ELEVEN STATES, and then went ahead to write “AND OTHER STATES”


LP had produced the results in the mentioned 11 states,, and proceeded to continue to produce the results in some “OTHER” additional 7 States, making it a total of 18 States in all..

How can the INEC be expecting Peter Obi to tender only the STATE-LEVEL Collated Results for the States they were disputing, without him tendering all the Polling-unit Results, and all Wards Collated Results, and all the LGAs Collated Results of all the States he intended to dispute..??


For the Fact that he wrote “And Other States” inside his petition,, he is at liberty to dispute the whole if the 36 States and the FCT...
Thus, the 11 mentioned states are sacrosanct..
Any other states he added are at his choice.

Before bringing the remaining 11 states,they must inform respondents beforehand and properly serve them notice

femisplash:
@ senatordave1, you are very correct, Obi was busy tendering documents that was outside his petition. Obi is really clowning.

I am almost always correct

cktheluckyman:


continue dreaming!! Hementioned the states in his petition.As long as the LGAs are in those states,INEC has no case

He did not mention those additional 7 states

/
INEC messed up big time.

They are hoping on legal technicalities and bribery.
That's why INEC and her Siamese twin APC were shouting "Go to court!"

/

INEC is a very silly organization. Having sakd that, Obi will still lose at the tribunal and at the Supreme Court.

Who noticed INEC chairman hardly make public appearance.

If it was China, INEC chairman would have been sentenced to death for treason

senatordave1:


He will inform the court and respondents before hand

Not in this vase. LP clearly added those results sheets in their list evidence. INEC is saying they should have listed each LGA in the petition.

senatordave1:

I am almost always correct

99.8% most of the time.

femisplash:

99.8% most of the time.

No,80%.

But if they refused to admit then bring your own evidence to court to prove Tinubu won the election. Bring your own documents to prove Tinubu won, INEC say NO.
Na wa oo

GeneralPula:
Pinhero explained that issues were not joined in the local government areas where the result sheets were sought to be tendered, adding that it was wrong for the petitioners to go beyond the areas where the election was disputed.

According to INEC, the local government areas unlawfully smuggled into proceedings of the court are totally strange to the petition and cannot stand in the face of the law.

Imagine. Lamba Nanu & his crooked Lawyers..

Interesting days ahead..

So the petitioner created another local government out of the local governments INEC conducted their selection or INEC is just scared of their own election results ?

Joevics:

Not in this vase. LP clearly added those results sheets in their list evidence. INEC is saying they should have listed each LGA in the petition.

Lp listed 11 states.now they are bringing 18 states.lp are not even denying

I_Neck

No matter how rough,sketchy,and dangerous a road is,The driver will get to his destination..the begining dey sweet,but the bottom of the soup, the shawale dey memerize..

Hotwest:
If it was China, INEC chairman would have been sentenced to death for treason

Yes let INEC bring evidence to prove if those documents were fake , still they can't.
Bring documents as evidence to prove Tinubu won the election, still they can't.

Very funny

sreamsense:
Court does not deal with emotion, but the law. For obi to bring irrelevant materials as exhibit will just amount to waste of time. Is it not the same EC8A that one 'Amaka' would sign for all polling unit agents of other parties for fraud cases? How can that be reliable? The electronically transmitted ones remains more reliable. LP can't teach INEC on how to do her work. Same procedures were followed where LP won and other previous elections. At the end of the day, INEC and APC will give reasons for their objections and let's see if LP will not begin to cry foul again

did you read it at all? the objection is not cause the documents are fake for all documents are certified true copies bearing inec stamp...try read why inec is objecting it

Well they must have a reason but constitutionality is important here

senatordave1:


No,80%.

Lol, ok

This getting interesting. Inec already jittery

This is just laughable. Is it an LGA election that results should be contested at the LGA level? This a presidential election where INEC as the umpire is saddled with the responsibility of it's success or failure should account for it's roles in explaining those area of contention. I would pose a question to the learned SAN; if you are looking for the eyes of a 🐠🐟 where to you turn to? The tail? This guy is a joker.

oyebanji44:


Wetin obi wan go find from the areas where the election was disputed.?

inshort , dat obi na mumu....

Trash

Shame on INEC

So useless they have forgotten the Independent in their name

MatrixCircle:

Yes let INEC bring evidence to prove if those documents were fake , still they can't.
Bring documents as evidence to prove Tinubu won the election, still they can't.

You didn't read the post.inec is not objecting because of its genuineness but the wrong way of presentation