senatordave1:


Not true.the petitioner must not just prove that it isn't tallying but must show that he won

Obi is not here to show that he won.


Obi is here to prove the the whole election was fraudulent...
And should be re-conducted all over again..

And this time around,, done correctly..

IF NOT, HE WILL STILL TAKE THEM TO COURT AGAIN.!!

Nakuza:
Who noticed INEC chairman hardly make public appearance.

I no blame him..


1. Shame.
2. Fear.
3. Security.
4. Threat to his life.
5. Etc

At the rate INEC is going I can comfortably make two assumptions:

1. INEC is covertly sabotaging the drug Baron.

2. With avalanche of evidence produced by LP, Satan must defeat God for the Tribunal not to declare the drug Baron a usurper, Order a recount of the real results and after the counting, declare Peter Obi of Labor Party the duly elected president, for meeting the constitutional requirements!

BluntCrazeMan:


Source:
https://www.vanguardngr.com/2023/06/inec-explains-refusal-to-accept-admittance-of-documents-in-evidence/

**My Own Submissions On This Very Issue..**

Inside the LP’s PETITION,, I could clearly read where they specifically mentioned ELEVEN STATES, and then went ahead to write “AND OTHER STATES”


LP had produced the results in the mentioned 11 states,, and proceeded to continue to produce the results in some “OTHER” additional 7 States, making it a total of 18 States in all..

How can the INEC be expecting Peter Obi to tender only the STATE-LEVEL Collated Results for the States they were disputing, without him tendering all the Polling-unit Results, and all Wards Collated Results, and all the LGAs Collated Results of all the States he intended to dispute..??

How could the INEC be expecting them to present some LGAs inside any state which they are disputing, and then leave out some other LGAs,, yet they were supposed to be disputing the results in the whole of the mentioned states, and including “other states”?


For the Fact that he wrote “And Other States” inside his petition,, he is at liberty to dispute the whole if the 36 States and the FCT...
Thus, the 11 mentioned states are sacrosanct..
Any other states he added are at his choice.

Joevics:

Not in this vase. LP clearly added those results sheets in their list evidence. INEC is saying they should have listed each LGA in the petition.

But the Lists of All the Local Governments in all the States are already inside the Nigerian Constitution..
Why repeating them again inside the petition.??

INEC have been COOKED..
They have entered ONE CHANCE...

CHAI..... OBI DEY CARRY INEC DEY GO WHERE THEM NO NO

MatrixCircle:
But if they refused to admit then bring your own evidence to court to prove Tinubu won the election. Bring your own documents to prove Tinubu won, INEC say NO.
Na wa oo

When their own time comes,, they would have to present their own evidence too.

BluntCrazeMan:
Obi is not here to show that he won.


Obi is here to prove the the whole election was fraudulent.


And should be re-conducted..
And this time around,, done correctly..

IF NOT, HE WILL STILL TAKE THEM TO COURT AGAIN.!!

He can't prove that

Mboi2:

He will inform the court that elections were held in all LGA in Nigeria? Una mumu never do?

He will inform the court and parties places he intends to dispute

BluntCrazeMan:



Bro..
Go to paragraph 101 where they wrote down all the documents which they would plead during the trial..
Go to paragraph 101(b) and tell me what you saw there.

In fact, read this response here.

They must state the particular areas....

senatordave1:


Lp listed 11 states.now they are bringing 18 states.lp are not even denying

Read this thing I am going to write here-below,, and tell me what you understood by it..

1. Rivers
2. Lagos
3. Taraba
4. Benue
5. Adamawa
6. Imo
7. Bauchi
8. Borno
9. Kaduna, and
10. Plateau
11. Other States of the Federation.

Question-1: Is the list restricted to only 10 States? (Or 11 States??)


Question-2: What is the MINIMUM number of States which is allowed by this list.??

Question-3: What is the MAXIMUM number of States which is allowed by this list.??

Danniedpastor:


Wrong way of presentation?
Was it not INEC that realeased those true copies to LP?
Point of correction. INEC is not even talking about they way the evidences were presented. They are saumying that LP should not have presented true copies from LG levels and also documents outside the seven states they mentioned in the petition.... You sef know say INEC don dey fear

Inec is saying that the documents being pleaded now were never pleaded by lp

MatrixCircle:

Yes let INEC bring evidence to prove if those documents were fake , still they can't.
Bring documents as evidence to prove Tinubu won the election, still they can't.

When the time comes for them to defend their case,, they might produce the needed necessary evidence.

senatordave1:


He will inform the court and parties places he intends to dispute

He did that. He mentioned them on his petition.

BluntCrazeMan:


Source:
https://www.vanguardngr.com/2023/06/inec-explains-refusal-to-accept-admittance-of-documents-in-evidence/

**My Own Submissions On This Very Issue..**

Inside the LP’s PETITION,, I could clearly read where they specifically mentioned ELEVEN STATES, and then went ahead to write “AND OTHER STATES”


LP had produced the results in the mentioned 11 states,, and proceeded to continue to produce the results in some “OTHER” additional 7 States, making it a total of 18 States in all..

How can the INEC be expecting Peter Obi to tender only the STATE-LEVEL Collated Results for the States they were disputing, without him tendering all the Polling-unit Results, and all Wards Collated Results, and all the LGAs Collated Results of all the States he intended to dispute..??

How could the INEC be expecting them to present some LGAs inside any state which they are disputing, and then leave out some other LGAs,, yet they were supposed to be disputing the results in the whole of the mentioned states, and including “other states”?


For the Fact that he wrote “And Other States” inside his petition,, he is at liberty to dispute the whole if the 36 States and the FCT...
Thus, the 11 mentioned states are sacrosanct..
Any other states he added are at his choice.

Bros, I don't know if you are a lawyer. It doesn't sound like it. Pleadings are required to be specific. There is nothing like "...and other" You must state the exact evidence or data that you want to show in your pleadings in detail so that the other party can prepare a defense. There is nothing like someone erroneously said below - surprising your opponent. If you surprise your opponent he has the right to ask for an adjournment to study any new evidence not specifically pleaded and to amend his pleadings if necessary as well as adduce additional evidence to meet it.

You do know that this matter is going to the supreme court and the Sc can only rule on matters argued in the lower courts. So everybody needs to be specific. If you are not or if the lower court wrongly admits evidence the earlier judgment can be overruled.

Everybody is setting traps here at the tribunal. The real fireworks is at the court of appeal.

Keep your powder dry. The road is far. This is not WWF

BluntCrazeMan:



According to the Pre-Hearing Report,, Any documents that were produced by the INEC themselves doesn't need to be given notice to the same INEC again before tendering, since the same INEC who produced such documents already knew what was inside the documents they produced and gave to the petitioners..

And INEC, and APC, and BAT/SHETTIMA all agreed to this before the proper hearing began.

That is a report not law.the law states that parties must be given notice of what they want to do

senatordave1:


You didn't read the post.inec is not objecting because of its genuineness but the wrong way of presentation

Well..



The judge had already responded to the issue of “Presentation” with regards to any evidence that was released by the INEC themselves..

Lovelive:
What are you trying to prove gon gon?
Please if you are not satisfy with LP/Obi's ways of dealing with the criminal called INEC and its evil APC gangs, please go to court.




Go to court !

Lp will lose on technicality

DesChyko:


Can you bring the section in the petition where just 11 states was listed please?

Let's be sure you're not basing your submission on hearsay.

Go and read lp petition

sreamsense:
Court does not deal with emotion, but the law. For obi to bring irrelevant materials as exhibit will just amount to waste of time. Is it not the same EC8A that one 'Amaka' would sign for all polling unit agents of other parties for fraud cases? How can that be reliable? The electronically transmitted ones remains more reliable. LP can't teach INEC on how to do her work. Same procedures were followed where LP won and other previous elections. At the end of the day, INEC and APC will give reasons for their objections and let's see if LP will not begin to cry foul again

You should be ashamed of your self
Do you even love this country at all ?

Remember person wen bellyful go hungry no forget

oyebanji44:


Wetin obi wan go find from the areas where the election was disputed.?

inshort , dat obi na mumu....

Boss na you be the mumu here o..

APCNig:
LP petition will be thrown into the dustbin on TECHNICALITIES. It’s becoming clearer everyday.

BAT is HERE for 8 years

So you agree that in REALITY APC lost but will win by TECHNICALLY

Kubin:
barrister to my little knowledge 'and', is not ambiguous word is as clear as portharcourt express road,no holdup.

It is with respect to nigeria.the law must make sense not confusion

Hotwest:
If it was China, INEC chairman would have been sentenced to death for treason

That's The Fact👌

WAPINATION:


But court had already admitted the documents moreover the said documents are certified true copies from INEC so why should same INEC reject their own document as evidence citing that it came from local government levels hence can not be tendered as evidence? So how did they arrive to the results they collated in Abuja which led to their declaration of a winner is it no longer results presented from local government areas then to state before the Abuja collation?

When you want to determine the cause of a problem you must start from the root. You don't just start from the effect. The simple thing here is that INEC has been caught off guard and about to be exposed.

All I know for sure is that this case is going to be a long ride for LP but surely the truth will be revealed cos INEC can not reject its own very document as illegal else they will have to prove it.

Una see this money weh Yakubu chop take impose a leader on us all e go hook am shebi the other man called Apapa don rest now he doesn't come to court again to drag leadership of LP and to request that all LP case in tribunal be withdrawn.

We are watching!

No sir,in court you don't catch people off guard.you must always let them know what you are bringing to court so as to give fairhearing and defence.there was rigging but not enough to change anything

Kubin:
that Inec San is nothing but a daft,when you read obi petition you will find out that he has the right to bring evidence in all the states,he mentioned eleven state and other states,try to understand common English,on the long run that and 25% in Fct is where am waiting for Inec San interpretation of the word 'and' its clear that Inec is not independent at all.

Obi mentioned 11 states not 18 states there therefore the 7 extra states are invalid

You forgot to add:
* also beat the usurper in a state he govern with iron fist for eight years, and even allegedly murdered someone, a top contender for governorship, a real omoulabi.
* Also beat the usurper in his real home State of osun State, a State he always dictate who will rule until the dancing senator & real omoulabi told him enough is enough, including our lovely Alfa; Rauf Aregbesola.

* Also beat him in Abuja, the territory he is to rule from!

Abeg Tinubu no get shame at all.

Since 1999, leaders always rig elections and get away with it. E reach Tinubu turn, he and the illiterate INEC chairman connived to run am sharp sharp. Now Nigerians don caught them.

tegrianonigltd:


Big Mumu, Mumu Wey don build successful businesses, chairman 3 banks, chairman SEC, sit across boardrooms home and abroad, governor a state, corporate world guru, astute economist.

A very big Mumu, modest Mumu Wey no allow family enter politics, no use power put any family, wonderful Mumu Wey get 6.2 m votes in less than 8 months of campaigning in a new party, God abeg ooh, better Mumu.

sangresan:
Know this and have peace.

Obi is an Igbo man. Igbo man cannot rule Nigeria for now. That's the unwritten rule. Stop fooling yourselves like kindergarten pupils.

If for instance Obi becomes the final winner,, what will happen.??


He will still not rule Nigeria because he is an Igbo Man.??

Answer me oo

senatordave1:


Obi mentioned 11 states not 18 states there therefore the 7 extra states are invalid

go and read obi petition,he said 11states and others,or you don't know the meaning of others, efulefu.

oyebanji44:

Wetin obi wan go find from those areas where the election was disputed.?

inshort , dat obi na mumu....

Lolz. I won't be surprised if Obi's mumuness is wiser than the wisdom of the wisest person in your family.

sangresan:


Stop smoking weed. You neva hear.

Obi is disputing the results in Adamawa and Osun.

If the election is conducted 200 times, Obi Kekerenke won't secure 80,000 votes in Osun State.

If he said that the election in Osun was manipulated, and that he can prove it,, then, let him go ahead and prove it.

senatordave1:


No sir,in court you don't catch people off guard.you must always let them know what you are bringing to court so as to give fairhearing and defence.there was rigging but not enough to change anything

If it was only rigging but massive vote suppression and I guess thats the major reason LP has to opt for tendering the form EC8’s as their evidence and since the document they tendered is issued and certified by INEC bro there is no how the court won’t act on it because the document is of INEC and not doctored nor manufactured by the LP.

You don't expect their evidence to come from the results that were rigged at the state level already then collated by Yakubu in Abuja to declare APC winner no we all have to go back to the root where the results came from which units of wards of LGA’s. This is the only place clear evidence can be obtained from to ascertain the truth and fair judgement to all party involved so my brother if the judiciary is not partial they must act on that document since it was of INEC its as simple as that.

senatordave1:


He can't prove that

We still dey court oga.

Stop pre-empting.

At the end of the whole wharrever, whoever that wins, let him take the seat.

One thing is, we have changed the situation already, and we are going to change the situation even more sef in the near future.